• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    7 months ago

    LoL!!! You do your job as just because you’re doing what’s required you’re called a quiet quitter? Man fuck that noise.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      7 months ago

      turns out capitalism is highly dependent on making workers produce an excess of value and then claiming that excess value for the owners! i wonder if anyone has written anything about that

      • ctenidium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s also very funny, when someone shares the idea of a 4-day work week (while the wages stay the same as before during a 5-day work week) many are like “that is not possible, how should it be possible to compensate that?” And nobody ever says that about unpaid overtime. Which is a unbelievable high sum each year!

    • TheFermentalist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree. It used to be called “working to rule. “ I like “acting your wage”

  • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    During a bad day the bosses mom asked me why I wasn’t my usual chipper self. I said if you want me to smile all day every day I need paid more. Then the boss yanged at me “why are you telling mother you want paid more?!?” and I told him, because I want paid more.

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    Capitalists are always the ones who expect free lunches. They think they can squeeze workers without consequence, but that pressure just erodes the foundation of society and drives instability through various mechanisms. Populism, crime, war, and other destabilizing trends are a natural consequence of fucking around. Propaganda and distractions can only buy so much time before they get to find out.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The meta problem to that is the super rich are gambling on failure just as much as they gamble on success. They have their super portfolios so spread out that if something fails they may lose money on the thing but make more money on the effects of the failure with other investments. And for the most part, they don’t handle that at all, it’s data science run hedge funds that are running trillions of calculations a minute as markets and global shifts occur to ensure that “line go up” for the accounts they manage, which results in a lose-lose for everyone else, because often the bad social things happening are more profitable so they will try to move the market in that way. Hypercapitalism is fucked

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The issue is that they aren’t as smart as they think they are. They’ve created a more dangerous world for themselves and their children, and while they’ll still be at the top, their position is far less stable. They’re still trapped on this planet with us, and are still vulnerable to the apocalyptic problems they’ve caused.

        • gimsy@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s wishful thinking, in world history there’s always been who is on top, and in general the conditions of people are far better than in the past, thanks to (or despite of) capitalism

          Wealth redistribution is sign of a mature society as well as punishing who abuses societal rules for private gains

          Some societies are, in many ways, more mature than others, and western society aren’t much better that eastern ones, despite what we like to think, they just value different things, including status symbols, and being better off than the average, when this is left unchecked… It causes problems, to the point where it is not possible any more to control it

          And here we are

        • rhadamanth_nemes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not a great response but… Basically they are gambling they’ll be dead before the bill comes due.

          It helps that human made environmental changes are novel, meaning that while we have histories of other disasters befalling our planet, we haven’t seen this particular one before. And since our enemy is the super rich who control much of the media output, they can cast enough doubt over everything to get away with it for long enough for them to die off.