• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sorry… you’re arguing that corporate greed and price gouging are acceptable things because enough people are willing to pay that price anyway?

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not price gouging, there’s no coca cola shortage and it’s not a necessary for life good. You’re acting like you can’t just stop buying it

      And yes, the price people willing to pay for some goods is a reasonable price for them, unless it’s some necessity or it’s some disaster area. If it was unreasonable, people wouldn’t pay that price. Especially for something like coca cola

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry… how is a price increase that is not justified by inflation not price gouging?

        Price gouging has nothing to do with what is necessary and Coca-Cola is being used as an example. I’m not why you think this is singly about coca-cola.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think this simply depends on your definition of gouging. If I used “to charge someone too much money for something, in a way that is dishonest or unfair” as I found from google, one could argue that the increase was justified by some others means that didn’t qualify as dishonest or unfair, which is also subjective.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s justified by inflation, inflation is an average.

          For example, if thing A goes up 20% and thing B goes up 0% we say the inflation is 10%. You will complain that A went up faster than the inflation. But you’re cherry picking the data, since you ignored B not going up