• KAYDUBELL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Have you not seen 28 days later or 28 weeks later? They’re pretty solid

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have, but that’s not what they mean. 28 years later will be its own trilogy apparently.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s basically what the linked article says, the first two paragraphs:

            EXCLUSIVE: After landing the villain role in Ryan Coogler‘s next project, Jack O’Connell continues to fill out his dance card. Sources tell Deadline that he is set to join the cast of 28 Years Later, a sequel to 2002’s 28 Days Later. Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Ralph Fiennes also star in the pic, which is part of a planned trilogy.

            Danny Boyle is directing the first movie from a script by Alex Garland. Sony will release the film in theaters globally.

            • KAYDUBELL
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh yeah, I’m not arguing. I just think it’s kinda crazy lol

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not trying to argue, sorry if it came across hostile. Just pointing out that the confusing title actually means what it implies.