• HM05@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think events like the UAP over Langley AFB and the UAP engaged by military over North America last year should have more coverage than they’ve had. There is a clear presence of objects of unknown origin that even our own military is concerned about. It should be an issue that bridges beliefs of what the objects are and where they come from. Whether they’re drones, NHI, or you name it, there is something engaging military bases and even interrupting military exercises. Unfortunately, the stigma on this subject can easily silence the news.

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Of course. The media is willfully ignoring this issue because of a) the potential for ontological upset, and b) no profit-oriented upside. Most of the MSM is owned by one of the 6 giant corporations. For these people the status quo has worked phenomenally well. The UFO issue threatens to destabilize the status quo. For those who are hanging onto the status quo with a white-knuckled grip, the UFO issue is a huge risk at best, and an apocalypse at the worst.

      Thanks to the efforts of a lot of people on the ground and also inside the deep state, the issue is no longer possible to ignore. But the MSM likely will do absolute minimum for the disclosure. So the MSM isn’t going to and cannot completely ignore this issue. The MSM will participate conservatively in order to continue to attempt narrative control.

      So if disclosure is unavoidable (pssst: it is in fact unavoidable), the billionaires and their minions will spin the disclosure in the least damaging, least disruptive for them way. But of course they will also pretend nothing is going on as long as possible because they serve their own interests, not mine or yours. They wanna keep things stable and same-y. It’s pretty simple.