• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t know how true this is, but CNN is reporting that the judge has decided to quietly back off further enforcement of the gag order, even though he denied the motion to quash it.

    My guess is that this is his way of not actually having his bluff called the next time Trump crosses the line. It’s also another great example of how there’s a two-tier system of justice in this country. Good to know that when push comes to shove, the judges will continue to do nothing while wondering why Trump continues to run roughshod all over everything.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I had read Trump posted and deleted a rant on witnesses just yesterday or over the weekend. Maybe that was false or I misread older news.

      Edit: looks like I saw an older post. Trump has moved on to having his pawns do the lies for him.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trump has moved on to having his pawns do the lies for him.

        This latest stunt of having a rotating set of bootlicking douche canoes attend court with him then talk shit in the media is pathetic and disgusting.

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          6 months ago

          This latest stunt of having a rotating set of bootlicking douche canoes attend court with him then talk shit in the media is pathetic and disgusting.

          It’s also essentially a job interview for future cabinet positions should Trump be re-elected.

        • KevonLooney
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s funny because his lawyers are in court right now arguing that Michael Cohen did not act on Trump’s behalf. Meanwhile, there’s a parade of losers outside clearly acting on Trump’s behalf.

          The defense lawyers don’t really have a coherent argument, but part of their strategy is to pretend Michael Cohen used his own home equity loan to pay off Stormy Daniels for no reason. As if that’s totally normal. We’ve all (at some point) acted in Donald Trump’s best interest, not at his direction, right?

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            their strategy is to pretend Michael Cohen used his own home equity loan_ to pay off Stormy Daniels for no reason. As if that’s totally normal.

            That’s the thing that cracks me up. They’ve got to convince the jury that there are just rogue lawyers out there taking out home equity loans to protect their clients without discussing it with their clients. Like it’s just a completely normal thing to do.

            Maybe Trump’s current team of lawyers will make their closing arguments and be like “and it turns out that during this trial, the entire defense team has mortgaged their houses to keep this trial going, all unbeknownst to our client. The defense rests.”

        • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yea it is pathetic and disrespectful to his supporters. Trumps says he’ll trade jail for free speech, then immediately has his booklicking douche canoes come and do the speaking, so Trump can avoid jail. Imagine how little self respect you have to have to see this and think “Yea, trumps my guy”.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The point of the gag order was to stop Trump from intimidating key witnesses (Daniels, Cohen, and Pecker). Whether or not it achieved its goal, it’s much harder to justify after the witnesses have already testified.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not really.

        Let’s say Trump decided to attack Stormy Daniels now that she’s done testifying, and she starts getting inundated with threats (or worse, something happens to her). What is the next witness going to think? Why would the next witness testify if they know they’re going to be the subject of one of Trump’s dog whistles right after they’re done?

        The gag order needs to stay in place and in full effect until the end of the trial.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That is correct. Once the witnesses have testified, there’s no reason to enforce it without inferring bias. The gag order is still very much enforceable in protection of jurors and court staff until the trial is complete.