• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m not the OP either but my brain seems to work the same way that yours and theirs do. I’d say you did a good job of describing how it works for people like us.

    One difference though is that you don’t seem to have the visual recall that I do. I don’t have a “photographic” memory but I could probably recall the hypothetical map as a visual object and examine it for additional information that I didn’t notice the first time.

    I can personally push it to a visualisation, but it takes significant mental effort, and the results are unstable.

    You may actually be better at this than I am. Describing my results as “unstable” would charitable. I also don’t get dog breeds, just amorphous and blurry blobs with rorsarch like colors slapped on them.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I also don’t get dog breeds, just amorphous and blurry blobs with rorsarch like colors slapped on them.

      That’s akin to what I get. The core structure is there, but it’s almost a sense of what should be there. It’s akin to seeing things out of the corner of your eye, while overtired. Your brain tells you what it is, and you accept it, it doesn’t necessarily match what you are actually ‘seeing’.

      I ‘know’ how dogs move, I ‘know’ their body structure. I can force that down to a single image, but it wants to be so much more. All the senses of ‘dogness’ compressed into a single entity.