The vehicle is a key part of the justice’s just-folks persona. It’s also a luxury motor coach that was funded by someone else’s money.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/zQdpf

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      At one point, republicans need to show proof or shut the fuck up. They’ve been talking about the stupid laptop for years to eventually admit they have dogshit. They claim to have dirt on Hunter Biden but never back it up.

      It is clearly a diversion tactic as usual.

      If they do have dirt on him, throw the book at Hunter/Joe Biden. Until then, shut the fuck up.

      • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        He just got offered basically a free pass for a felony of possessing a gun as a prior drug user. Something the average citizen would be sitting in prison for a minimum 10 year sentence for.

        That’s sounds like a REAL big order or free French fries.

        PS I’m not a republican, I’m just calling out the obvious corruption of that dirt bag getting a pass.

        • venusenvy47
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Every gun owner that legally uses weed in a weed-legal state commits the same felony by lying on that same form, when purchasing a firearm. It’s pretty common to not prosecute this felony.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not whataboutism. Corruption is bad. It’s asking for consistency.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Whataboutism implies that you are using that actions of person A to justify person B. It is not when you point out condemnation of person B for the same actions as person A but person A is not condemned.