• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    my friend has a 20yr old core 2 duo system with the latest updates on windows 10

    • lud
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Comparing apples to oranges are we?

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            x86 hardware is standardized in a way where you don’t need to port an os to them, it just runs with generic drivers.

            arm still needs a custom kernel and completely different drivers to even boot, because every manifacturer can implement it completely differently.

            there are efforts to fix this (namely project mainline and some work on arm uefi standards) but they arent done and wont be for a good while.

            • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              arm still needs a custom kernel and conpletely different drivers to even boot, because every manifacturer can implement it completely differently.

              Dunno why you’re getting downvoted, this is correct. ARM makes comparatively very expensive to maintain an OS over a variety of CPU models. The specialization required by each Cortex revision (and beyond that, each manufacturer adaptation) is too intense for a world trying to conserve resources.

              x86 hardware is standardized in a way where you don’t need to port an os to them, it just runs with generic drivers.

              That being said, I’m honestly shocked your friend doesn’t run into issues. Several ISA extensions have been released for x86 since the Core 2 Duo days, and I have to imagine software incompatibilities appear semi-frequently. Running Windows 10 on that can’t be a good experience.

              • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I have to imagine software incompatibilities appear semi-frequently. Running Windows 10 on that can’t be a good experience.

                actual issues are rare actually, it pretty much just works as long as the hardware supports the features the application requires. if it doesn’t it will likely throw an error and not run.

                you are right in that its an awful experience though, its usable but you have to debloat it and even then its slow. can’t watch hd video either.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      First of all, you’re implying it runs latest Windows - but Windows 11 shipped a few years ago.

      Second - not really a fair comparison. 18 years ago the iPhone didn’t even exist. And the oldest model (17 years old) had really weak hardware. 4GB of storage, 128MB of RAM, and the CPU was an order of magnitude slower than current spec CPUs (it was also 32 bit - and 64 bit ARM is a completely new architecture - similar to the failed Itanium).

      Even if it was supported, it would be a horrible experience.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            try it yourself, but dont expect it to be good. a lot of hardware sold today, especially very cheap hw on the 3rd world, still has similar performance than 15year old hardware. think atoms celerons and such.

            if it were up to me id be running linux on it, but it works if you need it to.