• Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Second amendment means we should have anti-aircraft missiles too. This is not a joke. I am serious.

    • CoderKat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, even if it were legal, who would be able to afford it? It’d just mean the ultra wealthy would have even more powerful private armies. A single missile costs at least a few hundred thousand dollars, with some systems costing millions per missile. Which is unfathomably expensive when you think of what you can buy with a few million dollars.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anti-aircraft missiles, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear SAMs, shall not be infringed.