• ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    There was a jewish state there when the romans invaded over 2000 years ago. Look it up, their state was called judea and the romans named it (something similar to palestine) after conquest finished.

    • volodya_ilich
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes but you can’t claim ownership of a territory that is currently inhabited by people who didn’t expell you themselves or their immediate ancestors, based on a 2000 year old historical claim.

        • volodya_ilich
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          No it doesn’t, the Jewish people 2000 years ago weren’t a state, weren’t the only people in the region, and there’s no continuity. The claim is ridiculous

            • volodya_ilich
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Not as a state, no, my point here isn’t arguing for the recognition of Palestine as a state, it’s arguing against the forceful and violent removal of a local population. Whichever nation the locals belong to is a matter of self-determination, not up to me to decide.

    • spiderplant
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      There were multiple Jewish kingdoms, not one unified state that the modern day nation state can claim it’s descended from. The kingdom of judea is pretty small compared to the modern borders.

      Never mind that trying to claim that isreal is the continuation of a 2000 year old kingdom with nothing in between, is a pretty brain dead argument.

      • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Which is why I didn’t make that argument. Learn to read. The same can be said about palestine too btw, both have a history mixed of existance and non-existance.

        • spiderplant
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Native jews, christians and muslims in historic Palestine only need to point to the fact their parents or grandparents lived on a specific bit of land, while Zionists need to point to a state thats been dead for 2000 years.

          Bringing up Judea in respomse to OP who never mentioned any other historical state kinda does implicitly make that argument.

          Also your reponse to volodya about how you’re trying to counter the “israel came into existence 70 years ago bs” despite the fact modern day isreal did only come into existence 70 years ago and is completely detached from biblical israel or any historical Jewish state reeks of Zionism.