• JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 days ago

    Mint was the distro that converted me. After 8-10 years, I’m still using the cinnamon DE, but just on top of Arch. Next hope is the devs port it over wayland so I can also ditch xorg. (There is a demo/alpha available)

    • HStone32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Can somebody explain why everyone is trying to ditch xorg? I’ve never had an issue with xorg, but I’m always hearing about major issues with Wayland.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Xorg(and the x server protocol) is very old and like most long lived software has quite a few warts and quirks.

        Wayland has been “the future” for like 10 years (though it’s quite a bit older). It’s only now starting to reach a critical mass where things are starting to change so it might feel a bit of a mess at the moment.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Because it is mess or a program. If nothing else Wayland has much better security. However, X tends to be less performant and harder on power usage. It also has poor support for input devices such as touch screens and is unreliable with multiple different monitors.

      • Cargon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Better multimonitor support, VRR, and HDR are some of the promises I think. I want all of these things but not enough to switch away from Linux Mint. I’ll be happy when Wayland makes its way in over the next couple of years.

      • JATth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Wayland has much more up-to-date graphics technologies behind it to put it simply.