• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t see a problem with the title. That’s literally what happened. It makes no judgments.

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Why are we still using the word “scores”

      Edit for the haters: go ask someone tomorrow how much a “score” is. Most people would have to look it up, which makes it inappropriate for a headline where “hundreds” is more appropriate.

        • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe hundreds?

          Scores is such an 1800s word. It’s simply not used in today’s vernacular, and I’m not sure why you’re defending it.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I wasn’t defending anything. I literally asked what would be better.

            Apparently asking what would be better was bad.

    • spaduf@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think it feels reminiscent of an explainer and that kind of gives me the ick. Maybe I’m being silly though