• YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      19 days ago

      Wow am I glad you stated that this person was a lesbian, I might not have understood the situation otherwise.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        Imagine thinking a casual descriptive noun has deeper meaning when in a neutral context.

        If they had said something derogatory it’d be different but talk about a leap.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          The question is: why would you add this description if it’s completely unrelated?

          By specifying this attribute, the commenter wanted to draw attention to that fact, that this was a lesbian. So, why exactly would that fact need attention? Best case it’s completely irrelevant, more likely it’s supposed to be some sort of weird bragging or simply an underhanded insult.

          • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            I just read it as storytelling. Many people add details that don’t matter in the end. It just adds to the story so it is easier for the reader to imagine it.

            Like how George RR Martin spends PAGES on the food in Westeros and how it was cooked and prepared. The food description has nothing to do with the story, but it added to the story.

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              19 days ago

              Sorry but this is a terrible comparison imo. Sexuality is not a useful descriptor and adds no “flavour” to the text. Even describing their skin colour is better because that’s a physical attribute that you can at least imagine. You might as well tell me their blood type they have, it’s a completely useless descriptor in the context of OPs “story”.

              I’m not even on a high horse here, I don’t really care that OP brought up their sexuality, it’s a weird thing to do but not particularly offensive. All these comments spinning narratives about how it’s a useful descriptor are completely baffling. Y’all are performing some mental gymnastics for absolutely no reason.

              • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                Sexuality is not a useful descriptor and adds no “flavour” to the text.

                That’s just, like, your opinion, man.

              • JoYo@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                i almost got punched by an aquarius when i suggested they clean their bong.

                Is that preferable? I didn’t ask them their birthday and I don’t actually know what an aquarius is.

                All these comments spinning narratives about how it’s a useful descriptor are completely baffling.

                oh which comments?

                • Moneo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  Dude I don’t really care, if you thought it was funny that’s fine by me. Aquarius is just as useless as a descriptor as lesbian.

          • JoYo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            It was definitely bragging.

            I am very proud that I interacted with a person regarding the unknown state of their paraphernalia.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            19 days ago

            Or or or. It’s a descriptive noun thrown in for no reason because sometimes humans just do that.

            I don’t know a single person who hasn’t given unnecessary details when talking about literally anything.

            • JoYo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              No problem, I can be less descriptive. I hear all people love brevity.