graphito@sopuli.xyzM to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 19 days agoyay, no dunning kruger for me! hold up, oh nofiles.mastodon.onlineimagemessage-square136fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageyay, no dunning kruger for me! hold up, oh nofiles.mastodon.onlinegraphito@sopuli.xyzM to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square136fedilink
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 days agoI don’t doubt that there is a factor but you’re clearly overestimating how much of a factor it is. If two smart people have a kid and the kid grows up in poverty, they’re much less likely to grow to be “successful”.
minus-squarevga@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-218 days agoWhat do you mean when you say that I’m “overestimating”? I’m asking this because I feel like you’re thinking that I’m claiming something I don’t think I’m claiming.
minus-squaretrashgirlfriend@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 days agoWell, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children. I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component. From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor.
minus-squarevga@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-218 days ago Well, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children. That wasn’t my first claim. My first claim was that IQ predicts success. I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component. Then I went here because you brought up parents. So not a non-sequitur but a specific reply to your comment. From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor. When I specifically said it’s not clear how big of a factor it is. So no, I don’t think a reasonable person would assume that.
I don’t doubt that there is a factor but you’re clearly overestimating how much of a factor it is.
If two smart people have a kid and the kid grows up in poverty, they’re much less likely to grow to be “successful”.
What do you mean when you say that I’m “overestimating”? I’m asking this because I feel like you’re thinking that I’m claiming something I don’t think I’m claiming.
Well, you claimed that children of parents with higher IQ have more successful children.
I pointed out that this is largely due to social factors, to which you replied a non sequitur about how intelligence has a genetic component.
From that, a reasonable person would assume that you believe that genetics is a major component of IQ, and not just a small contributing factor.
That wasn’t my first claim. My first claim was that IQ predicts success.
Then I went here because you brought up parents. So not a non-sequitur but a specific reply to your comment.
When I specifically said it’s not clear how big of a factor it is. So no, I don’t think a reasonable person would assume that.