Speaking at a news conference in Doha, Qatar, alongside Qatar’s prime minister and minister of foreign affairs, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Mr. Blinken said that “a deal was on the table that was virtually identical” to one that Hamas put forward on May 6.

At some point, he said, “you have to question whether they’re proceeding in good faith or not.”

  • Count042@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nope, but there has been a native population, blood thirsty colonizer.

    The land wasn’t empty. You don’t get to pretend it was.

    • Cleverdawny
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      So your position is that it’s more legitimate for someone to live there because their ancestors moved there under the Ottomans rather than people whose ancestors lived there before the Romans and moved back under the British?

      I don’t give a fuck about any of that. What I care about is that the Jewish militias were happy to accept sharing the land with a Palestinian state, while the Palestinians decided that any possible Israeli state was unacceptable and declared war.

      The entire conflict stems from their inability to accept peaceful coexistence.