• BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      But they mean specifically a vacancy tax. So anyone who owned vacant property would have a large additional payment or get it rented

      • cheddar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t see this working. Not only the property owners would transfer this cost to your monthly payments, the government would need an enormous bureaucracy to actually control and enforce this law. I don’t believe this is technically possible to achieve.

    • AbsentBird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, like market rate for the property. Everyone pays property tax, regardless of whether the property is vacant or occupied.

      • Nick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        My dad inherited my grandma’s ancient house recently and is practically forced to find a way to remodel it to be rentable because there is a imputed rental value tax where I’m from.

        • AbsentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          What’s the alternative, just leave it empty?

          I would think it could also be acceptable to transfer ownership to a relative who doesn’t already own a home. It just seems like a waste to have a house with nobody living in it while so many people are unhoused.

          • Nick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I guess he could sell it but then its pretty likely that it’s brought by a property developer, as we can’t afford to buy it off him. As it stands, the house isn’t really suitable to live in