• vividspecter
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Batteries too seem to be growing exponentially, perhaps even more so than solar. See the cleantech report from RMI, page 14 (PDF).

    I suspect the people that still claim that renewables + storage alone can’t work are going to look pretty silly in 10 years time (although they’ll likely find a way to move the goalposts yet again by that point).

    • mormund@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m confident solar + batteries will solve short term storage. But as far as I know energy density is just not there for seasonal storage. However when energy becomes dirt cheap, chemical storage through Hydrogen or downstream products should become an economic no brainer as well

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Seasonal storage is mostly not needed. Close to the equator it is not due to not really having a season problem. Further to the poles you have stronger winds in winter.

        • mormund@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That could be the case. But with solar prices consistently dropping every year it should dominate even more in the future. I’m not so sure wind will keep up

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, there’s a bunch of modeling that shows that fairly small amounts of storage enable 90% or more decarbonization at temperate and tropical latitudes.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m so excited to see what happens in the remainder of the decade with this. I’ve been 100% on board the Tony Seba hype train since I saw the report on what it would take to have a fully renewable solar, wind and battery grid and the implications of that. It seems like we’re actually on track for this to become a reality.

      • vividspecter
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No more having to deal with the Middle East and Russia for energy needs will be a massive benefit. Essentially it’s that “energy security” conservatives pretend to care about.

      • Baggins@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sadly it will be a long time before that happens. I wouldn’t mind betting China an Russia keep it unavailable for some of the smaller countries that have fallen under their influence.