• vividspecter
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Batteries too seem to be growing exponentially, perhaps even more so than solar. See the cleantech report from RMI, page 14 (PDF).

    I suspect the people that still claim that renewables + storage alone can’t work are going to look pretty silly in 10 years time (although they’ll likely find a way to move the goalposts yet again by that point).

    • mormund@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m confident solar + batteries will solve short term storage. But as far as I know energy density is just not there for seasonal storage. However when energy becomes dirt cheap, chemical storage through Hydrogen or downstream products should become an economic no brainer as well

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Seasonal storage is mostly not needed. Close to the equator it is not due to not really having a season problem. Further to the poles you have stronger winds in winter.

        • mormund@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That could be the case. But with solar prices consistently dropping every year it should dominate even more in the future. I’m not so sure wind will keep up

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, there’s a bunch of modeling that shows that fairly small amounts of storage enable 90% or more decarbonization at temperate and tropical latitudes.