The land, water and air around us are chock-full of DNA fragments from fungi that mycologists can’t link to known organisms. These slippery beings are so widespread scientists are calling them “dark fungi.” It’s a comparison to the equally elusive dark matter and dark energy that permeates the universe.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That would be more along the lines of what’s the difference between Joy Division and new order. One dead body. Rip Ian.

      Or what’s a Goth’s default mode? Depeche.

      • treefrog
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        May he keep Deedee Ramone company until we all get there.

    • treefrog
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I figured but still wanted to correct the dark matter/dark fungi metaphor in the article and saw an opportunity to do so with my favorite squid as I used to listen to Bauhaus as a kid.

      Twenty years ago most biology books still classified fungus as plants. That’s how young mycology is as a science. So, there’s lots of unidentified fungus on the planet, but we still fundamentally understand microbiology as a whole.

      Much different than dark matter/energy as we’re not sure really what they ‘are’. We only know them by their effects.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I went to college in the '90s. Fungi being classified as plants is new to me. Though perhaps it is part of some Mandela effect or misremembering on my part. But it is inarguable that we’ve learned tons more over the last 20 to 30 years about them.

        • treefrog
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m sure it depends on the book. I have a mushroom field guide published in the late '90s that still calls them plants. Which was really weird to me considering it’s a mycology book.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That could just be down to the author and their aptitude. Lot of people writing field guides aren’t exactly scientifically minded or trained. Because fungus really are kind of anti plants in many ways. It’s sort of like the distinction between fruits and vegetable for tomatoes. For most people tomatoes have always been and will always be vegetables. Despite having long been classified scientifically as a fruit. And pineapples are berries.

            • treefrog
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s fair. I suppose I was overestimating the knowledge of the field guide writers.

              • EarthShipTechIntern
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                As some of my myco-heroes (Stamets & Sheldrake) have mentioned, there were no mycology departments or colleges at universities. In many, there still aren’t.

                Writers, mycologists may have felt like stepping up & speaking truth about classification (at times, a scientific bureaucratic nightmare) was not the fight they wished to pursue over sharing knowledge they’ve learned about fungus (no bureaucratic dealings!)

              • Doxatek@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Typically a vegetable is any vegetative piece of a plant that isn’t a fruit but coming from stems roots or leaves