Hi! Did you bump into this post from the pin on !diy@hexbear.net? Check on my current progress on my user posts! This account is a dedicated alt for this project alone, sorting by my new posts will show the latest on this project.

Hey 🥰 I’m a transfem who’s been working on something that I think might be of interest here and I’d love to share, because I believe that we can share a very mutually beneficial relationship. This post is about permanent hair removal.

I am going to use the term “transfeminine” in the following as an abridged version of “transfeminine, non-binary, and any other individual, queer or not, who would feel more confident and affirmed with less facial or body hair”. This is a project for everyone.

A little bit of background on permanent hair removal:

Really, the only two options on the table are laser/IPL and electrolysis. Speaking to the former first, laser/IPL is without a doubt the most accessible of the two options, but it comes with a lot of drawbacks. For one, laser/IPL is neither permanent nor complete. This may sound like an immediate dealbreaker, but the ability to delay and diminish hair growth down to light wisps for months to years at the cost of only a handful of sessions makes it a valuable instrument in transfeminine gender affirming hair removal. The drawbacks don’t end there though; another serious and deeply unfortunate drawback of laser and IPL hair removal is that they don’t work on all skin tones and hair colors. The mechanism of action depends on light passing through the skin and being absorbed by hair roots (which then heats up the follicle, damaging it, hopefully, to the point that it is unable to continue growing), meaning both light skin and dark hair are requirements for eligibility. This is deeply unfortunate for all but People of Pasta. AyyyyyOC There are other drawbacks, like an increased incidence of adverse skin reactions relative to electrolysis, but the two issues noted above make it a non-starter for black and brown folks and extra-bleached-flour crackers. These issues in mind, laser/IPL is a tool that can be relied on at times, but for trans folks, laser/IPL is a non-starter for bottom surgery preparation due to the incompleteness and temporary nature of the procedure.

Electrolysis is permanent, 100% complete, works on all skin tones and hair colors, and has a lower incidence of skin-related side effects. Perfect! What’s the catch? Electrolysis is expensive as fuck. Where a complete course of bikini area laser or IPL may cost hundreds of dollars, the same area with electrolysis will cost thousands, sometimes as high as tens of thousands of dollars, due to the fact that unlike laser/IPL, which takes a second per exposure and can be done in areas of hundreds of hairs at a time, electrolysis must be done hair by hair, which is a lot of time to spend with a licensed cosmetologist/electrologist. Costs are similarly prohibitive for facial electrolysis, and even more wildly exorbitant for body hair removal due to the large surface area, so much that it is virtually never even discussed as an option for this. This won’t do either. What is to be done? back-to-me-shining

The mechanism of action of electrolysis hair removal is to insert an electrode in the form of a fine needle down the hair shaft and pass a current through the electrode, into the hair root, and out through a return electrode elsewhere in the body. This causes an electrochemical reaction in the hair root that produces a few nano/microliters of lye, which super, definitely, for sure kills the hair. (if you know the difference between galvanic, blend, and thermolysis, you’re way ahead of the class, good eye but I’ll bring it up again later.)

At home electrolysis exists, but it is not easy or cheap as it currently stands. Issues with machine quality, battery consumption, and power make this an option, but an undesirable one. My hope is that we can make it easier, cheaper, and safer, by designing an option that is more robust, more available, eats through fewer batteries, operates with greater power, and is designed with constant dynamic community dialog.

One thing I didn’t lose in my transition is my audacity: surely I can make a device that applies a small current through a fine needle-like electrode in a short burst, right? So I got to researching. Can I buy professional-quality electrolysis needles without a cosmetology license? (yes, I can!) Are there readily accessible schematics for precision low-amperage current sources widely available? (yes, there are!) Are there resources available not paywalled behind cosmetology/electrology programs to learn to use this thing once I have a prototype? (yes, there are!) Has anyone tried to do this before? (Yes!!! Twice!!! More than that! Reddit user /u/abbxrdy, Github user ivanbarayev, the folks on the Hairtell forms, and Andrea James at Transgender Map, I have so much love in my heart for you. Here’s to hoping that your work forms the foundation to bring accessible hair removal to all.)

My goal is to make a highly buttoned up, safe, accessible, and presentable electrolysis solution for transfeminine people to use on themselves, each other and for others to use on them. I want to cut out the cosmetologists, or specifically those in the electrolysis chain that take the surplus value from transfeminine people, like salon owners and machine manufacturers. I also want to avoid reliance on sparsely available, weak, and poor quality machines, which are the current sole option for at-home electrolysis. Ultimately, the goal is to bring safe, highly effective, and accessible electrolysis hair removal to all. Currently existing solutions generally fail on at least one of these. My objectives are as follows:

  • Develop a circuit that can administer a 0.1 to 10 second pulse of current between 0 and 2 mA at a voltage between 0 and 25 V through an electrode upon each press of a button, foot pedal, or even bite switch, with no wall plug-in for safety reasons - battery power only.
  • Make it into a printed circuit board that can be ordered and built out with no more than a soldering iron and YouTube tutorial level soldering skills.
  • Develop a design for a probe that can hold an electrolysis needle, that can be actualized at home, without any advanced tools.
  • Create a high quality and easy to follow manual for the build and usage of the device. This is missing with all current DIY solutions. This has to be something that is truly accessible to all - no electronics knowledge, wiring, debugging, multimeters, or anything else like that necessary.
  • We’re shooting for a budget under $100, but in general, cost is a deciding factor. It’s not accessible if it’s expensive.
  • For now, my intention is to start with a galvanic only electrolysis machine. Blend and thermolysis produce much faster results, but I don’t feel as confident working in high frequency electronics, and with galvanic being the most reliable option, despite being slower, it’s the obvious pick for the 1.0 version. If this takes off, the plan is to continue with a blend or a mode-selectable version, which would really democratize electrolysis. If this works, blend electrolysis provides ten times faster hair kill time, and it’s next on the menu. 👀

Here’s what I’m capable of doing by myself:

  • I’m an experienced multidisciplinary engineer. I have the skills to see through a basic version of this project to completion.
  • I can also write a nice assembly and usage guide, I have experience in guide and technical writing for laypeople.
  • I can bankroll all R&D and prototyping.

Here’s what I would definitely benefit from community help on:

  • I work terribly alone. I find it hard to get motivated if I don’t have a team to share the work with or at least bounce ideas off of. I’m also not deeply experienced in this, and community collaboration will get rid of a lot of stumbling blocks that are probably easy avoidable. If you’re experienced in analog electronics, you’re the number one type of person I’m looking for, but I’d also love to work with digital/embedded folks when it comes to interface/UX time, or additionally anyone with electromechanical design experience for the probe.
  • Saving the above, I still do much better with folks on the sidelines cheering me on, asking me questions, and keeping me accountable than I do alone, even if I’m working by myself.
  • If you’re a professional electrologist, I’d love to know what you like and don’t like in a machine, what features are mandatory, what features are nice to have, and what features are pretty useless. If you have any other tips and advice, let me know!
  • If you’ve tried DIY electrolysis before, please tell me how it went and how I can do better than whatever your most recent attempt was!
  • I need help discussing the licensing. Do I want to go hardline GPL to prevent this from being picked up by manufacturers? Do I make it as open as possible with the hopes that someone can fabricate nice ones? Do I allow for manufacture with the provision that royalties be paid to some entity, which can then be redirected to some mutual aid project/charity/Maoist insurgents? Maybe even use a personal use only clause so I reserve the option to sell units as a worker’s cooperative? This is all cart before the horse shit, but it’s stuff that needs to get worked out before I make a github.
  • What do I call it???

Going forward, I plan to post regular bi-weekly updates to keep this alive, days of the week pending Maybe Thursday and Sunday?. Look forward to the first journal entry/post tonight where I show off what I have so far! I think /c/diy is the most applicable place to post due to the comm purpose, but this initial post is getting cross-posted to /c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns due to the relevance in that community.

Let’s stay in touch! This is an alt but I’ll be checking it frequently. Thanks for being an awesome online community and I hope this can happen in a way that results in material good for my comrades. meow-hug

  • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    now just need an auto-targeting system so that my shakey hands dont result in a giant gash. auto-targeting electric needles also sounds like some sort of terror device

  • frankfurt_schoolgirl [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I absolutely love this project! Besides DIY and biohacking type stuff being cool as fuck, I think that once of the most useful and empowering things that trans people can do for each other is figuring out how to do medical stuff for ourselves / each other, instead of needing to rely on cis doctors.

    I actually have tried to use DIY electrolysis on my face. This was when I has very early in transition. I was about to start estrogen, and had basically done nothing else. I really wanted to do something about my facial hair, and also knew that it was a pretty normal step to do around when you start hormones. But I didn’t have that much money and I was afraid of coming out to anyone, so I didn’t want to get any professional stuff done. I bought the One Touch unit (white plastic case, 9-volt batteries), a makeup mirror, and some tweezers. I read a bunch of old guides on how to do it, and decided to do a test patch. I ended up targeting just the hairs on my lower lip, and removed them all over the course of like 2 sessions. Then I waited for a while to see if they would grow back. Unfortunately, most of them did grow back. I found that really demoralizing after all the work to remove the hair in the first place, and I basically gave up. Since then, I’ve gotten professional laser and electro. It would have saved me a lot of time and money if the DIY version had been easier.

    I think that one of my problems was not leaving the probe in my follicle for long enough. Those home units are Galvanic, which to my understanding means that it needs some time in your flesh to really kill the hair. The One Touch makes a tone once you’ve held the probe in for a couple of seconds, so I would always remove it after that. I think I actually needed to wait longer and the tone was annoying and useless. Also, I now realize that some regrowth with electrolysis is normal, because you can only kill hairs in a certain growth phase.

    For your project, I think you want to really pay attention to the user experience and interface of the thing. Ideally, you should make it difficult to use incorrectly, and easy to use correctly. Maybe timers on the unit that show how long to hold the probe in? Maybe a little counter that ticks up when you’ve done a hair? Maybe a battery strength indicator so you know when to recharge? Anyway I’m super interested in this project and would love to hear more updates. I don’t know much about electronics, but if you need any software I’m happy to help.

    • 410757864530_dead_follicles [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your experience is super valuable here, I’m so happy someone who’s actually used the One Touch units has stopped in! Given they’re the only somewhat viable solution I know of for at home electrolysis, I would love to have you around for asking questions to!

      Ergonomics wise, you have some really good points, I like the idea of a audio beep when each hair is done and I hadn’t thought of it yet so I’ll try to roll that in somehow! I’m definitely aiming for hard to use incorrectly/easy to use correctly. Screens, even 7-segments, require an additional layer of circuit complexity that I might not implement in a 1.0 design, but it’s a possibility! I’m much more likely to just use status lights for now.

      I’ve heard this experience a lot, where using the One Touch leads to almost complete regrowth. I suspect that the One Touch uses an unboosted 9V, which is on the very low side - I plan to be able to drive up to around 22 volts, which I believe is the main factor of why the One Touch was largely ineffective. At that low of a voltage, from my understanding of units of lye, and especially if the probe isn’t sourcing very much current because of the circuit design or if your skin is highly resistive, it’d take over fifteen seconds per hair to have a high likelihood of killing the hair. I’ve also heard a lot about the One Touch needle probe being too thick to reach the depth of the hair bulb without pain and potential for scarring, further reducing the odds of successfully killing the hair - that’s the advantage of designing around the Ballet needles I have linked in the post, but they’re more expensive so there’s a flipside as well.

      by the way, do you want me to add you to the tag list? As I get more development done I’ll probably have lots more ergonomics questions and I’d love to tag you for them!