• psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The problem is if only 10% of the population is obsoleted, that ten percent needs to find new, different, jobs.

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I want - and think will happen - 95% of jobs to be automated eventually. But even in the transition period, where some jobs are automated and some aren’t, universal basic income can be a tool to make it livable for all in the transition period.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        30% of jobs are going if self driving is achieved. Low pay jobs are here to stay for a while as they’re too expensive to automate. The current LLM stuff seems to obsolete low productivity people but still need the skilled writers or programmers to come up with new stuff or do the correct detail work the LLM sucks at.

        Some management is going to royally screw up by firing junior programmers since the senior programmers can get all the work done with the help of copilot

        But they’ll forget that they will in future need new senior programmers to herd the LLMs

        • SatouKazuma@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Some management is going to royally screw up by firing junior programmers since the senior programmers can get all the work done with the help of copilot

          This just happened on the team I was on. I’m getting ready to interview for mid-level and senior SWE roles, but was let go from my most recent role a month and a half ago.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            My workplace which now uses scaled agile used to be waterfall. We have an enormous system to take care of and there’s loads of specialised knowledge, so we were pretty well siloed

            So obviously when the sales people sold agile to the organisation they also sold the idea that a programmer is a programmer, designer a designer, tester a tester; no need for specialists, so in 2015 they spun up 50-odd agile teams in about six trains, one for each major system (where the used to be seven silos in one of those systems) grabbed one senior designer and programmer from each major project to put in an “expert” team

            And told the rest of us we were working on the whole of our giant system. Where we had trouble understanding how part of it worked, we could talk to one of the experts

            Now nine years later those experts have mostly retired, we have lost so much institutional knowledge and if someone runs into a wall you need to hope that someone wrote a knowledge transfer document or a wiki for that bit of the system