• SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    My point was just that someone who has a more right leaning opinion is not the same as the cretin in the OP.

    So what? A conservative is not the same as a fascist? What real fucking difference does that separation make? Both are cretins with abhorrent views at the end of the day. Are you a conservative?

    • Envis10n
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I’m not.

      Having a lean on a particular opinion at an individual level doesn’t mean shit. That’s nuance for you.

      The comment I replied to implied they felt bad for having any right leaning opinion at all simply because of other people with right leaning opinions being more extreme. I merely said it didn’t make them the same. Maybe the person will reconsider their positions after seeing the true nature of the conservative party. Maybe they have been blind to it.

      I don’t really know. It was just a one-off comment.

      • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Saying that someone with “right leaning opinions” and an outright ideologically committed fascist are “not the same” is a redundant comment due to both categorically being different positions in the sphere of right wing thought. Both positions are delusional, and the former should be at least slightly embarrassed for choosing to occupy the same ignorant, anti-human ideological tendency as the latter in any capacity, especially in the context of this post. There is absolutely no nuance, when a person actively recognizes that they “lean” rightwards ideologically on any issue, other than the nuance of their individual opinions inevitably changing as time progresses.

        You aren’t on reddit-logo anymore, and running any form of asinine one-off apologetics for right wing positions will rightfully get you flamed. Your kind isn’t welcome here.

        • Envis10n
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough.

          For the record, I was scrolling my Lemmy feed and saw the OP. Was reading the comments and simply replied to it. I’m not here to run apologetics for right wing positions.

          As I said in other comments, doing everything possible to stifle progress and maintain the status quo is the extreme position I’m referring to in my original reply. That has nothing to do with left/right. There are plenty of people all over the spectrum that refuse to allow humanity to move forward (or push to reverse progress). Anyone that is against moving us forward is fucking wrong.

          If even after I clarify this you still think I’m some fucking piece of shit stormfront facist, then I’m sorry. Either you have dealt with so many trolls it’s now expected from every new person, or you’ve made up your mind and it doesn’t matter what I say anymore.

          • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you are a fascist. All I know from the information provided so far is that you are a very lost redditor (look at the logo closely) who speaks with authority on subject matter he understands little about due to a lack of political education. That is always something quite annoying.

            Like the implication that there is a (mythical) reasonable right wing ideological position in a thread where we’re mocking some internet fascist for being an anti-human scumbag, is a wrong statement, unwelcome on this site, and functionally apologetics for the tendency at large. However, I believe that it was not your personal intention to do so.

            That was also some interesting stuff about the fervent defense of the status quo being separate from ideology but idk man at the end of the day your heart seems to be in the right place, I admire your open mindedness and genuine acknowledgement of a bigger picture for humanity, thats what matters. If you have the time, I would implore you to check out the works of modern alternative thinkers like Noam Chomsky, Mark Fisher, Micheal Parenti, and David Graeber, as reading their works is an exploration of novel perspectives about the current situation and the ways in which our progress as a species is stifled by bad actors.

            But be careful about what people tell you online though, you should never go to gen.lib.rus.ec and search for books to download using their extensive database because its illegal to violate intellectual property rights. People even use that site to circumvent paying for outrageously expensive college textbooks, very bad.

            • Envis10n
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I appreciate the response. However, I never intended for my comment to come off with any authority. I’m just a random fucking netizen. I thought it might be a good opportunity to show someone that is experiencing that break in delusion that there is light on the other side. Not that their right leaning opinion was reasonable (it’s not). Of course, it’s possible I misread the situation and context. I really didn’t notice where I was in terms of community. I’m happy I fell into this though, I immediately subscribed when I explored a little more.

              Addressing the status quo thing, I don’t mean to say the status quo is separate from ideology. Only that progress as a whole cannot happen when people want to maintain the status quo so badly that they are willing to throw away any and all morality. This is something that both sides of the political spectrum do (in terms of the US political left/right) as evidenced by democrat and republican voting records. Missed opportunities to move forward alongside bills straight up intended to be cruel to marginalized communities.

              Anyway, thank you for continuing to reply. I for sure will steer clear of the linked resource, as the thought of breaking copyright laws makes me shake in my boots. I would never download or access copies of obscenely overpriced reading materials.