• BigBananaDealer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    do you not see the logical fallacy of that? “its not wet i swear its just that everything it touches suddenly becomes wet and no one knows why”

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have repeatedly pointed out your logical fallacies. Wasn’t it just you accusing me of projecting? Lol.

      • BigBananaDealer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        projecting being mad not the fallacy part. and i was gonna say that earlier but kept forgetting to 😂

        water is wet just like fire is hot

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Water isn’t fire— false equivalency fallacy. Water isn’t wet.

          You really shouldn’t take this so personally. Have a nice nice day!

          • BigBananaDealer
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            water isnt fire but water is wet

            and its nothing personal. this is professional

            • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Water isn’t wet; it just makes other things wet.

              And if this is your job, you don’t seem to be very good at it.

              • BigBananaDealer
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                i am very good at it, ive been right the whole time

                also another use of lapse in logic, one which makes unto others wet but isnt wet? sounds like a riddle with no real answer, and makes no sense

                • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Apparently, not, as you can’t seem to wrap your head around the fact that water isn’t wet, it Merely makes other things wet.

                  • BigBananaDealer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    actually it is you who can’t wrap your head around the fact that water is wet, and it’s because it makes other things wet. water cant make wet water because water is already wet in the first place