• Uranium_Green@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Though it’s also worth pointing out that Sellafield is Europe’s largest nuclear site and has operated since the 40’s and suffered the disaster in 1957 when reactor design, nuclear safety and safe handling were in their infancy, and the world was just starting to explore harnessing nuclear power generation.

    And also to be more relevant to the subject of the article; this is one of the reasons why fusion should be being researched, much lower chance of problems arising from waste/risk of meltdown etc.

    Fusion isn’t fission, it could provide relatively cheap and clean nuclear power.

    • notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it hard to imagine a future where fusion power would be cheap. The reactors will most likely be highly complex, with very expensive materials and lots of custom parts. Fission reactors are much simpler and even they have become too expensive to run without subsidies. ITER is supposed to cost 22 billion, but the US DOE estimates it will be closer to 65 billion. And ITER is a tiny test reactor that will still draw energy from the grid while running. If we ever get a fusion reactor that can actually produce energy, it’s going to be so much bigger and more complex than ITER. And it will have a maximum output and operating life, so a finite amount of energy it can produce during its lifetime. Divide the cost for R&D and construction by the amount of energy produced, and it will most likely come out as much more than solar/wind + storarge.

      • Uranium_Green@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m personally quite interested in Helions design of fusion reactor, whilst I don’t necessarily think they’ll be the first to achieve a design viable of continuous operation, I think the insights gained from the much more complex and expensive “tradition” fusion reactors will hopefully help inform their design and make something viable for smaller scale cheaper operation that could be rolled out on a grander scale.

        One thing that is apparent with energy tech is that it always starts out expensive and typically goes down in price due to wide adoption and large scale production.

        Re the issues with operating life, etc; there are similar issues with almost every option whether solar/wind etc

        Obviously either way we’re going to run into issues with large scale energy storage. Here’s hoping Sodium batteries provide some effective respite for that in the near future.

        • notapantsday@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a counter point, fission power did not really get cheaper once the initial difficulties were worked out. They are still highly complex machines that require a lot of engineering, custom parts and precision manufacturing. The same is true for fusion reactors, we still don’t have the technology to build one that actually produces power.

          By comparison, solar and wind are pretty low-tech, so it’s easier to reduce cost by scaling up production and using automation.

          Here’s hoping Sodium batteries provide some effective respite for that in the near future.

          Yes, I have my hopes up for that one as well. Lithium-Ion was never meant to be cheap, it only got more affordable due to the massive scale of production, but it still uses expensive chemistry. If we could apply the same scale of production to a battery technology that uses cheaper materials and maybe less complicated processes, it would be a huge win.

    • Hector_McG@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right now, nuclear power plants use fission, which creates energy by splitting atoms — the science at the center of the blockbuster “Oppenheimer.” While nuclear power produces bountiful clean energy,

      Read the article. It claims that right now, nuclear fission produces bountiful clean energy, which it clearly doesn’t. And right now, neither does fusion.