• ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love that the article makes no mention of the US sending ships through Chinese territorial waters all the fucking time, but talks about this normal and legal action China and Russia took as “unprecedented”

    • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except those waters aren’t Chinese territory, which is the entire point of doing freedom of navigation cruises…to remind them of that fact

      The recent China-Russia operation was also in international waters, and you’ll notice it’s only a handful of senators making a stink about it to get some publicity, the military was pretty clear that it wasn’t a problem. They just shadow it like they always do.

      • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        After the Gulf of Tonkin fraud, why should American warships be allowed anywhere outside American waters

        • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, they don’t have to be allowed in international waters, you just need to get all the planet’s seafaring countries to dedicate all of their naval resources to a blockade of the US.

          The cheaper option is to realize that the USN is generally pretty serious about enforcing freedom of navigation in a way essentially noone else is able to, which is a net positive for the planet. Even when you factor in some of the shady activities and plain old fuckups that they are occasionally involved in.

          Frankly I’d be thrilled if China would actually act like the modern global power they clearly want to become, rather than joining Russia in some 1800s imperial LARPing vs the rest of the world.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is just peak morshupls It’s different when we do it cope

            enforcing freedom of navigation in a way essentially noone else is able to, which is a net positive for the planet

            The planet: us-foreign-policy

            1800s larping

            Who’s got the biggest system of prison slavery in world history, again?

            Who’s bringing back child labor?

            • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I am mostly sure the naval blockade of Cuba ended well before I was born, so there is zero freedom of navigation issue happening currently.

              The embargo only applies to US companies, we aren’t stopping other countries from continuing to trade witch Cuba.

              I mean, it’s stupid as hell, and will never work, but that’s about the extent of it.

              • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                33
                ·
                1 year ago

                The trade embargo, not the naval blockade. The trade embargo that the UN General Assembly has called illegal multiple times. Like how ships docking into US ports can’t trade with Cuba, or businesses trading with Cuba have to go through massive paperwork hoops to prove that they have zero American shareholders. Or like how Cuba has to import basic medical supplies from the other end of the world.

              • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                29
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The embargo has been active since 1960 and has never ended, I’m not sure where you got the idea that it had stopped. And yeah, while it doesn’t directly prevent anyone else from trading with Cuba, it does prohibit anyone who trades with Cuba (or even just enters a Cuban port for maintenance) from trading with the US for the next 180 days, and considering the US is such a major trading partner, that heavily disincentivizes other nations from trading with them, don’t you think?

                Either way it’s petty as hell and absolutely still happening, it infringes on Cuba’s right to self determination, and is not what I would call “generally pretty serious about enforcing freedom of navigation” by any stretch of the imagination.

                • KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Its amusing how this thread went from the legitimacy of various naval exercises and then shifted to trade policy when that didn’t pan out, which is an entirely different animal, its more of an elephant than a zebra. (It ain’t black and white, definitely grey.)

                  Trying to get me to defend the Cuba trade embargo ain’t gonna happen, because it really is pointless and harmful. But I like how its conveniently ignored that the rest of the world could easily more than cover what the US refuses to send to Cuba. The US Navy wouldn’t stop them from doing so, because the blockade ended decades ago.

                  But oddly enough, that doesn’t happen. I wonder why not? Because, oh no, what would the world do without more of those sweet, sweet dollars??? Yeah, never mind the ethics, one can’t forgo profits from trade with the US, so let’s go fuck the Cubans right along with the Americans, and keep our citizens fat and happy with a steady supply of Levis, Big Macs, and movies. But, you know, lets continue paying lip service to how bad it is while making money hand over fist in complicity.

                  A truly astounding amount of hypocrisy. The US has plenty of hypocrisy to go around too, but at least I am not going to try to defend it.

          • Yllych [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            1 year ago

            love to enforce freedom of navigation by seizing Iranian/Venezuelan oil tankers, enforcing embargoes on Cuba and.the DPRK.

            also love to wave around the word imperialism to describe state enemies when the us has fit that definition for the last 100 years.

          • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Frankly I’d be thrilled if China would actually act like the modern global power they clearly want to become, rather than joining Russia in some 1800s imperial LARPing vs the rest of the world.

            The rest of the world is at worse neutral to at least one of the two. Oh! I see, you don’t actually mean the entire world just the only countries you think matter us-foreign-policy

  • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good thing the US doesn’t do massive exercise with multiple counties, planning potential attacks on enemy countries. Cuz that would be really terrifying for those places with memories of Amerikan mass murder.

    • goatmeal [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah people really dunno how hawkish South Korea Park Admin was with lots of joint naval exercises with the US. This provoked Kim’s nuke tests. Thankfully SK elected Moon who had real summits with Kim. Unlike Trump who threatened him before not negotiating in good faith.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doing a friendly little joint exercise to establish the safety and security of international merchant vessels.

      Only someone who hated freedom would be against that

  • philomory
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know it’s utterly besides the point, but I am in love with that shitty map graphic in the article. It’s just so funny to me for some reason I can’t articulate.

    • Vncredleader@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      God imagine the amount of oil they’d have to use to get to Alaska. Can they even use the Panama canal for warships?

  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    American regime uses authoritarian intimidation tactics on ships exercising their freedom of navigation rights guaranteed by international law.

    • goatmeal [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      We don’t even share in their plunder!! People here think we do sometimes. Like if we didn’t have Nestlé Chocoslaves and Coffee slaves the price of these goods would go up… Libertarians believe these workers aren’t slaves. Liberals are worse because they shrug it off.

  • babyman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    window nail kiss behaviour bee butter seat bath near degree ice thick tongue still order watch dependent responsible sea stocking idea support paint short public rough now mother whip sponge high sponge self dear damage ornament free statement horn morning fowl reward regular map milk pipe late very prose canvas

  • babyman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    secretary lock stone opinion day sand boy narrow feather horse after weight purpose smoke dust army summer kick the house fight sea reward low spade amusement family thin decision driving son poison position still happy brick crime kiss church boiling sex fall news business cover rub quality sister birth run

  • babyman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    bee while trouble knot steam seed letter apparatus laugh basket probable bad minute house government bucket separate point reward plate far knowledge different reading apple chain quiet linen till taste book smoke regret damage rod ever as purpose peace reading wood guide whistle tongue rate this bag public fact cart

  • aby [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    voice news cheap bright give summer able pin possible carriage example purpose harmony why fruit look silver adjustment near under sugar soft test glove silk boy sharp religion awake copper knee question shoe here design existence flight night pull again quality store decision side chain over canvas time plant nose

  • babyman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    distribution up opposite field boy scissors common journey angle man adjustment expert error bitter cup taste wrong cold even base sun false worm hair horse secretary tray religion tin milk impulse old horse about rain poison rain organization work fight chalk plough jelly oven language wood sweet table hanging why