I was reading this reply chain and was like, “Please don’t use Wikipedia as a source please don’t use Wikipedia as a source please don’t use Wikipedia as a source” and-
Damn dude. 5 sources for your second claim but every single one of them references Adrian Zenz. So really it’s only one source. One source that is already debunked.
Wait, I’m supposed to actually read the sources I provide? I thought I could just copy and paste links I found on Wikipedia to automatically win the argument.
I can’t believe my heckin’ wholesome trustworthy BeeBeeCeerino would cite a report they didn’t even read drafted by a fringe lunatic reactionary that can’t even do basic 6th grade math
Dude come on, you’re using documents you barely read or half remember to argue with people who casually and easily debunked the documents that hold up your entire worldview and we did it 2 or more years ago. You are in way over your head.
“Oh yeah, I totally debunked your sources two years ago. That’s a real thing I really did, and you can take.my word for it because I’m from the internet, which makes everything I say trustworthy. You don’t need any sort of cited source, my word is good enough.”
Uh yeah I did, and I’m not the only one. I was permanently banned from Reddit for doing it lol. I realize you are probably inundated with replies dunking on you right now, but check my replies to your recent posts. I literally cited the document that disproves Zenz’s own report that he himself cites.
I was reading this reply chain and was like, “Please don’t use Wikipedia as a source please don’t use Wikipedia as a source please don’t use Wikipedia as a source” and-
That’s a weird way to spell “I am too incompetent to click on the links to secondary sources for what I want vetted”, but here you go.
First claim I made: https://www.un.org/ar/preventgenocide/adviser/pdf/osapg_analysis_framework.pdf
Second claim: https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764c
https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/china-forces-birth-control-uighurs-suppress-population
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22311356/china-uyghur-birthrate-sterilization-genocide
https://www.dw.com/en/china-uighur-women-reportedly-sterilized-in-attempt-to-suppress-population/a-54018051
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-53220713
Damn dude. 5 sources for your second claim but every single one of them references Adrian Zenz. So really it’s only one source. One source that is already debunked.
Wait, I’m supposed to actually read the sources I provide? I thought I could just copy and paste links I found on Wikipedia to automatically win the argument.
I can’t believe my heckin’ wholesome trustworthy BeeBeeCeerino would cite a report they didn’t even read drafted by a fringe lunatic reactionary that can’t even do basic 6th grade math
Bold statements for someone who didn’t read a single linked source.
Dude come on, you’re using documents you barely read or half remember to argue with people who casually and easily debunked the documents that hold up your entire worldview and we did it 2 or more years ago. You are in way over your head.
“Oh yeah, I totally debunked your sources two years ago. That’s a real thing I really did, and you can take.my word for it because I’m from the internet, which makes everything I say trustworthy. You don’t need any sort of cited source, my word is good enough.”
Jackass.
Uh yeah I did, and I’m not the only one. I was permanently banned from Reddit for doing it lol. I realize you are probably inundated with replies dunking on you right now, but check my replies to your recent posts. I literally cited the document that disproves Zenz’s own report that he himself cites.
I’m not the one using Wikipedia to back up my argument lmao.