Everyone I have something very important to say about The Agora.

The Problem

Let me be super clear here to something people don’t seem to understand about lemmy and the fediverse. Votes mean absolutely nothing. No less than nothing.

In the fediverse, anyone can open a instance, create as many users as they want and one person can easily vote 10,000 times. I’m serious. This is not hard to do.

Voting at best is a guide to what is entertaining.

As soon as you allow a incentive the vast majority of votes will be fake. They might already be mostly fake.

If you try to make any decision using votes as a guide someone WILL manipulate votes to control YOU.

one solution (think of others too!)

A counsel of trusted users.

The admin, top mods may set up a group to decide on who to ban and what instances to defederate from. You will not get it right 100% of the time but you also won’t be controlled by one guy in his basement, running 4 instances and 1,000 alts.

Now i’m gonna go back to shit posting.

  • Black Conservative@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    We are following a democratic process here. We aren’t delegating the decision making to an oligarchy, even if it would simplify things.

    Yes you are because the people swaying the vote will be users with dozens of accounts aka the Oligarchs.

    Your example of a “democratic process” is one user having 50 votes and another user having 1. If one user is 50 times more powerful than the other that isn’t democracy is it? That is apartheid.

    To prove it I would literally have to do it myself.

    • LizardKing@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      to prove it I would literally have to do it myself

      So no one else is doing this? If it’s not a thing that’s happening, why are you here trying to undermine the voting process?

      You’re the only one here threatening to abuse the voting system.

            • Hagarashi8@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I understand it can be done, what i’m saying is that it’s hard to be done without evidence. I don’t want you to shot a man to see that he can be shot, i’m just saying that it’s hard to find place where you can shot them without witnesses.

              • Black Conservative@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                How is it hard? Just use a VPN, make 20 accounts. Post one thing from each per day for 5 days then when the next vote happens vote 20 times.

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What is your goal on this server?

      If your intentions are pure, there is no reason for you to do something like that. If you witness people manipulating votes, by all means, come forward. But what is the point of posing this hypothetical, and suggesting that you would manipulate the vote?

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s a fine line between legitimate concerns and divisive red herrings. Do you honestly believe that our votes are being manipulated by bots right now?

          What’s the solution?

          • Jakylla@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not giving any solution, only participating in this debate about a potential (or not) problem.

            Only saying that your point is, as far as my understanding, to say that “Hypothetical” problems does not need any actions.

            My point is that hypothetical things may happen. We need to evaluate the chance for it to happen, against the damages it can do.

            Currently, I have these 2 things in the balance:
            - Interest that any organization/company/attacker may have in manipulating/disturbing our community - vs. Having a part of the community being manipulated - or (in the best case IMO) the community to be removed entirely

            The choice does not seems obvious for me, I can find reasons to manipulate this instance or what appears to be on this instance. Manipulating it may have impacts on others instances of all the federations (even if at lower levels).

            My current opinion is that, there is a problem that CAN happen, and so I don’t want to do nothing about it, and let it probably happen. And if it happen, cry.

            You seems to think that it may never happen (contrary to me), what does make you think that ? That is the question to answer to make me change my mind ! (And I’m ready for it, I’m not here to force my opinion, I’m here to read others and improve my opinion)

            • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.worksM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You seems to think that it may never happen (contrary to me), what does you make think that ?

              On the contrary, I’m fully aware that it can and will inevitably happen. However it’s not possible right now because the server is so small that I can check every account.

              There are other, more pressing issues which must be addressed, and this line of argument would lead to the Agora becoming gridlocked.

              The first thing I did was acknowledge that it was a valid concern. But we need to prioritize other things, and it’s not yet necessary to revamp the voting system, just a couple of days after it was created.

              Thank you you for participating in the debate and let me know if you have any other concerns.