we appear to be the first to write up the outrage coherently too. much thanks to the illustrious @self

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    between that thread’s activity pattern and how hard they tried to fudge the numbers on their own survey to make this feature look popular: boy there’s a lot of stank on this one

    but hey here’s some worrying shit straight from the Proton team:

    Our business audience was the most interested in a writing assistant, this is why we started gradually rolling it out starting with Business and Visionary plans. We will look into making it available to more users at a later date!

    so there’s something utterly fucking obvious for the “it’s only for business users” posters to consider; they’re doing the same frog boiling shit that all LLM fuckheads do.

    I’m tempted to crosspost David’s article and my mastodon thread to that community, since Proton hasn’t really replied otherwise, and they seem plenty active there answering softball questions and removing posts. I don’t look forward to the Kagi-level shitstorm in my inbox afterwards though

    • Steve@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      the thing about this is a “writing assistant” doesn’t have to be integrated into the email product. It could be a product in itself. If the “business audience(?) was the most interested in a writing assistant” you’ve got a fucken great standalone product opportunity on your hands. A Proton-certified LLM writing assistant that is magically better and more secure than anything else out there is not something you coyly slip into the email client and nudge everyone to use.

      It doesn’t matter what reasons they have for doing this. Their method of deployment says more than enough to me. They know it’s off-script and they know they want their fucken “audience” to do the marketing for them.