• D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    It wasn’t political power that the CPUSA leadership was worried about, it was specifically “dues paying members”.

    • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Political power” is a fuzzy concept; “dues paying members” is a measurable proxy. Alternate proxies (crowd size at events, number of people on contact lists, interest in or curiosity about leftism) seem much harder to measure and much less reliably connected to political power.

      I can see room for improvement, but the bottom line of “does this tactic help our organization grow?” seems reasonable.

      • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pretty sure you can use “dues paying members” as a valid metric without using it as an excuse to scuttle community outreach programs.

        If your org is too weak to do two things at once, your org isn’t strong enough to worry about reaching for political power.

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          If your org is too weak to do two things at once, your org isn’t strong enough to worry about reaching for political power.

          The solution here is to grow the org, so we’re back to the question of whether mutual aid can be an effective way to do that.

          • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            One way or the other, you’re going to be doing mutual aid projects with your comrades to help other comrades.