But the new regime, which places prisoners in what are known as structured intervention units, or SIUs, perpetuates many of those Charter breaches, the report says.
“SIUs cannot be said to have resolved the problems that rendered administrative segregation unconstitutional,” writes Rebecca Rabinovitch, the report’s author and a fellow with the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights at the University of Toronto.
“These constitutional violations, and the SIU system that permits them, should not be permitted to continue.”
Under administrative segregation, prisoners could be held in cells the size of hotel bathrooms for upward of 22 hours a day without meaningful human contact. There was little oversight of decisions to prolong prisoners’ time in segregation …
… leading to scores of people spending more than a year in conditions that met the UN’s definition of prolonged solitary confinement, something the international body equates to torture.
In 2015, the John Howard Society, along with the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, challenged the administrative segregation regime in a British Columbia court, resulting in a judicial declaration that the practice was unconstitutional.
A 2019 B.C. Court of Appeal ruling in the case coincided with a similar decision in Ontario court. Judges in both provinces said placing prisoners in solitary confinement required an external review process and a cap on the number of days people could be placed in isolation.
The cases forced Ottawa to scrap administrative segregation and introduce SIUs.
But the report says these thresholds are not always met. It cites figures from the SIU Implementation Advisory Panel, an independent body struck by the federal government to monitor the new regime, which found that only 34.5 per cent of prisoners were offered their four-hour allotments every day they spent in SIUs.
The data also show that 56.5 per cent of SIU stays exceeded 15 days, which is prohibited under the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, also called the Nelson Mandela Rules. Those rules are broadly accepted by the international community, but they are not binding on Canada.
The report recommends that the federal government amend prison legislation to define solitary confinement as 22 or more hours a day in a cell with no meaningful human interaction, in accordance with the Mandela rules; prohibit solitary confinement lasting more than 15 days; bar prisoners with serious mental-health issues from being segregated; and ensure prisoners receive adequate time outside their cells.
“The report tells us that the Charter abuses found by two courts of appeal in this country have not been addressed through structured intervention,” said Catherine Latimer, executive director of the John Howard Society.
Ms. Latimer said it’s possible the organization could mount another legal challenge against Canada’s segregation practices, and she predicted that other lawsuits will begin to mount. Late last month, a Quebec court authorized a class-action lawsuit alleging that SIU placements of more than 15 days amount to cruel and unusual punishment.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
But the new regime, which places prisoners in what are known as structured intervention units, or SIUs, perpetuates many of those Charter breaches, the report says.
“SIUs cannot be said to have resolved the problems that rendered administrative segregation unconstitutional,” writes Rebecca Rabinovitch, the report’s author and a fellow with the David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights at the University of Toronto.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
“These constitutional violations, and the SIU system that permits them, should not be permitted to continue.”
Under administrative segregation, prisoners could be held in cells the size of hotel bathrooms for upward of 22 hours a day without meaningful human contact. There was little oversight of decisions to prolong prisoners’ time in segregation …
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
… leading to scores of people spending more than a year in conditions that met the UN’s definition of prolonged solitary confinement, something the international body equates to torture.
In 2015, the John Howard Society, along with the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, challenged the administrative segregation regime in a British Columbia court, resulting in a judicial declaration that the practice was unconstitutional.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
A 2019 B.C. Court of Appeal ruling in the case coincided with a similar decision in Ontario court. Judges in both provinces said placing prisoners in solitary confinement required an external review process and a cap on the number of days people could be placed in isolation.
The cases forced Ottawa to scrap administrative segregation and introduce SIUs.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
But the report says these thresholds are not always met. It cites figures from the SIU Implementation Advisory Panel, an independent body struck by the federal government to monitor the new regime, which found that only 34.5 per cent of prisoners were offered their four-hour allotments every day they spent in SIUs.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
The data also show that 56.5 per cent of SIU stays exceeded 15 days, which is prohibited under the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, also called the Nelson Mandela Rules. Those rules are broadly accepted by the international community, but they are not binding on Canada.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
The report recommends that the federal government amend prison legislation to define solitary confinement as 22 or more hours a day in a cell with no meaningful human interaction, in accordance with the Mandela rules; prohibit solitary confinement lasting more than 15 days; bar prisoners with serious mental-health issues from being segregated; and ensure prisoners receive adequate time outside their cells.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
“The report tells us that the Charter abuses found by two courts of appeal in this country have not been addressed through structured intervention,” said Catherine Latimer, executive director of the John Howard Society.
@CanadaPlus @NightOwl
Ms. Latimer said it’s possible the organization could mount another legal challenge against Canada’s segregation practices, and she predicted that other lawsuits will begin to mount. Late last month, a Quebec court authorized a class-action lawsuit alleging that SIU placements of more than 15 days amount to cruel and unusual punishment.