Only days before it was due to come into force, the education secretary said she had decided to “stop further commencement of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, in order to consider options, including its repeal”.

Bridget Phillipson also announced major changes to the work of the higher education regulator in England, the Office for Students (OfS), in order to prioritise financial stability in the sector, as many universities struggle in the face of a mounting financial crisis.

The legislation, which faced bitter opposition from the point of its inception, required universities and student unions to take “reasonable steps” to promote free speech, or face sanctions by the regulator including possible fines.

Phillipson said the legislation was not fit for purpose and risked imposing heavy burdens on institutions. “For too long, universities have been a political battlefield and treated with contempt, rather than as a public good, distracting people from the core issues they face.”

She said the government remained “absolutely committed” to freedom of speech and academic freedom, adding: “This legislation could expose students to harm and appalling hate speech on campuses.

“That is why I have quickly ordered this legislation to be stopped so that we can take a view on next steps and protect everyone’s best interests, working closely with a refocussed OfS.”

Phillipson’s decision was welcomed by many in the sector who disputed the previous government’s narrative of a freedom of speech crisis in universities, and its claims that “cancel culture” and “no platforming” were undermining academic freedom. In sharp contrast to Tory claims, a survey of students by the OfS last year found nearly nine in 10 students in England felt free to express their opinions and beliefs.

The education secretary’s announcement coincided with the publication of an independent review of the OfS that concluded the regulator must reduce its strategic objectives to focus on monitoring financial sustainability in the sector, while also ensuring quality, protecting public money and regulating in the interests of students.

The lead reviewer, Sir David Behan, who was formerly the head of the Care Quality Commission, was also confirmed as the new interim chair of the OfS after the departure earlier this month of James Wharton, a former Conservative MP who ran Boris Johnson’s Tory leadership campaign in 2019.

  • Streamwave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    When the conservatives talk about freedom of speech they mean the freedom to say what they want and for everyone else to have to just take it.

    Uh, yes. Conservatives have a right to their values and views, they have a right to express them, and you have no right to prevent them or to threaten them with violence for doing so.

    Funnily enough, everyone has a right to free speech, not just people you agree with.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh don’t be a disingenuous arse.

      The conservatives are already protected by free speech laws, didn’t need to introduce new ones that favor them and allow them to say hurtful things and get away with it. If they want to say awful things on their own platforms, then that’s their prerogative, but the universities are under no requirement to give them a platform.

      • Streamwave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh no, not “saying hurtful things”! How terrible! However will we cope with people “saying hurtful things”?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          How about actually addressing the comment I made rather than making supercilious remarks?

          They don’t need a new special law they’re already is a general purpose law that is working perfectly. The conservatives don’t like the way it currently works because the way it currently works means they face backlash from their comments. That’s their problem though.

    • futatorius
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s also true that you have no obligation to invite them, just because they feel left out.

      • Streamwave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You: We’re just telling him we disagree with his political views!

        Also you:

        Do I have to use milkshake or can I use something more… permanent?

        Do you make a habit of going around making threats of violence against public political figures?

        • ReCursing@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          When they’re fascists I have no qualms about doing so, especially when they’re entirely theoretical and could never happen anyway because Farrage is too much of a coward to eve risk going near members of the public who don’t like him