• Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not really. Just as killing a person doesn’t kill an ideology, killing a person also doesn’t kill the profit motives for cartels.

    If anything it makes the problem worse. Because you’ve suddenly freed up territory in a very lucrative black market.

    The solution to the drug problem is to instead kill the motivations people have for doing the drugs in the first place:

    https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/what-does-rat-park-teach-us-about-addiction

    This means fixing the housing crisis, guaranteeing people jobs, food, water, shelter, and medical support. It means embracing harm reduction policy. It means ending the war on drugs.

    Drug use is a symptom of an unhealthy society. Fix the health of society and the symptoms will disappear, and with it the cartels as well.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not a meaningless war. It’s war for natural resources to allow CEOs pad their bank accounts with sweet, sweet government contracts to rebuilding this war torn nation. Also for oil.

        Or we need to show another country how big our dick is by picking a fight with them.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Profits are always a risk-reward balance. If the risk goes up (druglords are more likely to be killed) but the price doesn’t, then the market goes away.

      Most likely they would just up the prices and use the new profits to buy weapons to defend themselves though.