• jaschop@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This isn’t a copyright thing. This is a tech regulation thing, that creates the possibility for data protection agencies to stick their noses in AI company’s business.

    • spookex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      General purpose” mostly means LLMs. Companies have a year to write documentation and promise to follow copyright.

      Says it right there

        • Steve@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I love how the time factor is always ignored when tech companies eventually comply with regulation or just do the right thing. “at least they did it” isn’t an argument, it’s a consolation.

          It took airbnb over a year(!) to show all the fees up front on the search results page instead of waiting to show them on the checkout page. That’s over a year after their asshat CEO announced on twitter that they would be doing it (to quell the social media uproar about how deceptive it was)

        • Architeuthis@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Next time Lars Ulrich sues you you’ll be able to say you needed the Some Kind of Monster mp3s for AI research. It’s foolproof.

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        This quote got me rent free. If I break a law I don’t like for a couple of years, do I also get another year to “promise” to stop breaking it in the future?