No joke here. I just think stuff like this is interesting.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    First of all, I don’t believe that for a minute. That is what CPS is for.

    Secondly, that does not even come close to justifying letting 16-year-olds marry. That’s a reason that the foster system needs to be reformed, not that child marriage is a good idea.

    • kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t give a fuck if you believe me or not, CPS does not give a flying fuck about people in the foster care system. My ex-wife got raped twice while in the foster system after people like you told her that CPS would be better. Sure, she was not getting beat to death (figuratively; I have a feeling you’re gonna be pedantic about that phrase), but she was at least used to that part…

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Then, again, the argument should be to reform the foster system, and not maintain the child marriage system, which also facilitates rape.

        • kitnaht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’m NOT ARGUING FOR child marriages! You told me to give you a reason, so I did. The original poster above said states were trying to lower ages; they aren’t! The national minimum age is steadily rising. Some dipshit republicans in some states argued against it - that doesn’t mean that “states are lowering the age” as claimed.