ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 3 months agoSperm.slrpnk.netimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up1778arrow-down120
arrow-up1758arrow-down1imageSperm.slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoOh you don’t understand what a conditional is. Ugh, it’s so awkward when I have a better grasp on your native language, isn’t it? Now you’re adding furthermore elaboration where none is needed, but removing the original connotation. And I remind you, this is my third language. https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/grammar/english-grammar-reference/will-would would is the past tense form of will. Because it is a past tense, it is used: to talk about the past to talk about hypotheses (when we imagine something) for politeness. It’s polite to use a “would” as it implies that “if you were asked”, which is the more polite way of asking. Maybe it’s because you only speak American, and not proper English? Have it your way — as we really need to calm you down somehow — do you identify as a conservative?
Oh you don’t understand what a conditional is. Ugh, it’s so awkward when I have a better grasp on your native language, isn’t it?
Now you’re adding furthermore elaboration where none is needed, but removing the original connotation.
And I remind you, this is my third language.
It’s polite to use a “would” as it implies that “if you were asked”, which is the more polite way of asking.
Maybe it’s because you only speak American, and not proper English?
Have it your way — as we really need to calm you down somehow — do you identify as a conservative?