• trampel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    the color coding for the amount of books is the wrong way around. The classification with the lowest percentage should also come first on the x-axis. Right now you have to mentally subtract to get the percentages for people that read 10 books.

  • hades
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 days ago

    All right then, Germany, keep your secrets.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 days ago

    I’m calling BS on those numbers.

    Idk where Eurostat gets It’s info from but I assume that if you go on the street and ask people about reading books, they’ll lie.

    70% reading several books, as in from start to finish, not just “read a few pages”, in the past 12 months?

    Either it’s bullshit or the sampling is super biased. I’d believe those numbers of certain parts of the population, but in total? Nah.

    I’d like to see how the data would’ve been affected if the interviewers had also tested that the people know what books they read and roughly what happened in them.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    25 days ago

    62% in France only. I don’t believe it. They must have only counted novel, excluding comics or something.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    While with the internet at arm’s reach I may not read books as I did before, not even in the past twelve months, I am using that same “mental quality time” to view long videos explaining concepts in relativity and quantum physics, the history of science and of art, ancient cultures and civilizations, the origins of the languages we speak today, how Cuneiform was used in the Bronze Age…

    The scope of information - and quality presentation of said information - at our disposal today is mind-boggling, nothing short of astonishing when you start scratching even just YouTube.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      I do both. I’ve recently picked up reading before bed as a healthy habit and I’ve been slowly working through the Discworld series at about 1 book every month or two. It’s nice to not stare at a screen for a bit, although I do generally skip nights where I’ve stayed up too late staring at screens

    • daellat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Pbs spacetime is absolutely fantastic if you truly want to dive into the physics hole without too much of the math

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    25 days ago

    A “0 books” category would make this a lot more telling, unless “Less than 5” explicitly means 1-4

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      i thought its a 100% scale and the missing part on the right represents 0?

      but this stat is also missing germany and uk for no reason so its weird to begin with, who knows really

      • ohmyiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        25 days ago

        but this stat is also missing germany and uk for no reason so its weird to begin with, who knows really

        OP should have posted the original source, but there’s another comment with the actual Eurostat graph and it’s for the EU. It says Germany had no data available and UK is left out because it is not in the EU.

    • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      25 days ago

      The 0 books category is the empty space in the right side of the graph. The graph is about the percentage of people that read at least a book and then the colours say the different amount of books. Like if from 100 people 1 person read 12 books they would still count as only 1%. Their 1% would have a different colour tho. The people reading 0 books don’t count towards the percentage of people having read a book.

  • crozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    I always thought these studies would show an inverse relationship to how good the country’s weather is. The colder it is outside, the more likely you’d be to stay inside and learn. But not sure that totally lines up here….

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      i mean there are quite a few cold ones above and summer destinations below. there might be something there.

  • geography082
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    IMHO books are the point of view of the writer and is just that, a book. So I prefer get the information from actual people by talking and from all kind of sources.

    • Mikrochip@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Can’t really be for the EU, either, as it includes Norway and excludes Germany. Not exactly what I’d call beautiful data.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          This graph comes from Eurostat. It’s funded by the EU, but all European countries can participate. That’s why Norway and Switzerland are in the graph, even though they are out of the EU.

          The UK just doesn’t care being European, apparently.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      25 days ago

      This gets brought up every time with Eurostat. The UK no longer shares data with Eurostat, but other non-EU countries like Switzerland and Norway do. (also Germany is missing here, for some reason)

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        25 days ago

        Yes, having Norway and Switzerland included there shows that it’s more about the UK not willing to share than the EU refusing to include them in Eurostat

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        25 days ago

        It took me 10 seconds of Googling to see that Eurostat is funded through the EU.

        I mean, with the EU average it was kinda obvious that it would either be from the EU, or from someone too stupid to know that the EU isn’t Europe - but that’s why we check.