• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 days ago

    The big reason somebody might want air to water is that it enables a low-cost retrofit of an existing heating system which uses water to distribute heat. Definitely not what I’d choose if designing from scratch, but I can see how it makes financial sense in a lot of homes.

    And yes, induction is amazing, but there are a whole bunch of people who have been marketed into treating gas stoves as their personal identity.

    • Wanderer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think most of those retrofits aren’t cheap because the pipes and radiators aren’t big enough for the colder water. So it ends up needing a whole now install anyway.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        I can see how that could happen for some homes. Worth doing the calculation though, since it can be cheaper if the pipes are adequate.

        • Wanderer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          It’s probably always cheaper. The government is pushing for air to water. There are no subsidies for air to air which I think is a better way to heat a home.