• Thurstylark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The complexity is the point. The less people willing or able to jump through all the necessary hoops to receive their healthcare through the system, the less money they have to pay out. Adding more complexity in the form of yet another opaque approval system adds many more hoops to get through, which is actually the entire purpose of that system. Deloitte knew this going in.

    Yes, I have sympathy for the individuals who have to build this system, however I have absolutely zero sympathy for the company that put it into practice.

    Yes, the medicare system is needlessly complex, however Deloitte decided to replace manpower with cheaper automation which had the side effect of saving them work by increasing rejections.

    The world also happens to be complex. Enough so that both things can be true.

    • Tricky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Agree with all your points. I just wanted to remind people to hate the architect (in this case politicians and insurers), not just the coder.