paywall@rss.ponder.catMB to New York Times@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 2 months agoHouse Republican Subpoenas Blinken Over Afghanistan Withdrawalwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down11
arrow-up15arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republican Subpoenas Blinken Over Afghanistan Withdrawalwww.nytimes.compaywall@rss.ponder.catMB to New York Times@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square2fedilink
minus-squarebaldingpudenda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago Overall, it was a pretty good deal for the Taliban, critics said. “Trump all but assured the future course of events would reflect the Taliban’s interests far more than the United States,” Miller writes. H.R. McMaster, Trump’s second national security adviser, has recently called it “a surrender agreement with the Taliban.” Another member of Trump’s National Security Council said it was “a very weak agreement.” They should subpeona trump admin
They should subpeona trump admin