• Kumikommunism [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    The Intercept is still pretty great. That happened a while ago and the articles they are putting out still cover the same kind of topics and from the same positions, at least that I’ve noticed. Every article I’ve seen has been covering stuff that the mainstream media wouldn’t, and from the left. I don’t go to their site to skim, but I haven’t seen any bad articles.

    • footfaults [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 days ago

      In my time at The Intercept, I’ve watched the newsroom increasingly become dominated by management and bureaucrats whose numbers continue to swell as the number of people who actually produce news dwindles. While the Intercept now has one poor copy editor for the entire website, it employs two staff attorneys, as well as a legal fellow, a chief strategy officer, a chief digital officer, a business coordinator, a senior director of development and an associate director of development, a product manager, a senior director of operations, a chief of staff, and a chief operating officer. And for the first time in The Intercept’s history, as of Monday, the new editor-in-chief now answers to the CEO.

      The company’s org chart, pictured below, provides a sense of how top-heavy it has become with business hires (basically the entire left half). Organizational chart for The Intercept current as of April 26, 2024. (Credit: The Intercept)

      This orgy of management largesse has coincided with layoffs of the editor-in-chief, managing editor, national security editor, copy editor, photo editor, multiple senior editors, social media editor, as well as writers and reporters. There are passionate editors and writers left who still want to do news, like Ryan Grim and Ali Gharib, but they are toiling under the impossible odds of the new management regime.

      https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/why-im-resigning-from-the-intercept

      • TerkErJerbs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        Klip is awesome. I’m so glad he went out on his own to do what he does best.

          • TerkErJerbs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I don’t know who Raisi is nor am I following Ken so closely that I’m aware of everything he says or does. Also I’m not the crass comment police.

            From what I’ve seen he does good work. I don’t think there’s ever been a public figure who doesn’t fuck up once in awhile, and if there is they’re a fucking liar or good at hiding their flaws.

              • TerkErJerbs
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Again, I don’t know what you’re referring to. I can tell you feel strongly about whatever it is. If you want to explain it better and get me on board with it you’ll need to add some context around who this person is and why what Ken said about them is problematic.

                The work I’ve seen him crush is putting in endless FOIAs to expose massive wrongdoing at all levels of government and he doesn’t seem to pull any punches on whether it’s the right or the left fucking around or finding out, and I value that. But I’m still not hip to everything he says or does regards whom, and I’m not enough of a fanboy to drop what I’m doing right now to go down that particular rabbit hole. I do know he left the intercept over enshittification, on principal, which for a writer is a very risky but awesome and empowering move if it works out for him.

                  • TerkErJerbs
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    Thanks, now I understand. NGL I have and will again make comments like that when any number of people die (I’m not proud of that, it’s just a fact) but I probably wouldn’t do it so publicly. I’m also not a public figure. Is saying something dumb like this on his part enough to disregard the real work he’s doing? I’m not convinced.

                    I watch a lot of John Oliver so frankly this particular tweet looks pretty tame to me. 🤷

        • footfaults [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          It’s not as simple as

          I haven’t seen any bad articles.

          They aren’t going to just flip a switch and go from writing good articles to bad articles. It’s going to be more of, what articles do they not write?

          For all Glenn Greenwald’s flaws, the thing that made him leave The Intercept was the pushback he got from all these people in the part of the organization that Ken talks about that don’t do reporting but somehow keeps growing, that his stories were making Biden look bad and that it was helping Trump.

          That’s classic behavior from Manufacturing Consent. Choosing to not publish stories or not cover certain topics.

          I think the same thing happened to Jeremy Scahill. His big interview with one of the top leaders in Hamas was part of Dropsite News’ debut.

          The Intercept probably didn’t want to run that article.