🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoAnon pregamessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up1399arrow-down117
arrow-up1382arrow-down1imageAnon pregamessh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-squareAbsoluteChicagoDoglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 months agoExtremely drunk people are not in the state of mind to consent
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agobut if they got drunk knowing what they were drinking (like not being drugged or something similar) and commit a crime, they can still be liable, right?
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoboth things are crimes commited while drunk, and i believe in both instances the person is liable for commiting the crime.
minus-squareAbsoluteChicagoDoglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoMaybe I’m missing the point. I thought we were talking about consent, and now one cannot give consent while very drunk.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoi was talking about how she was sexually assaulting the guy
Extremely drunk people are not in the state of mind to consent
but if they got drunk knowing what they were drinking (like not being drugged or something similar) and commit a crime, they can still be liable, right?
How is that relevant?
both things are crimes commited while drunk, and i believe in both instances the person is liable for commiting the crime.
Maybe I’m missing the point. I thought we were talking about consent, and now one cannot give consent while very drunk.
i was talking about how she was sexually assaulting the guy