• AdComfortable1514@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So its 64-131 between work done by bystanders vs. work done by police?

    And casualty rate is actually lower for bystanders doing the work (with their guns) than the police?

    • Chefdano3
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Where on this chart does it show casualty rate per incident?

      • AdComfortable1514@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued)

        Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians

        and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police

        • Chefdano3
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          As casualty rate of the attacker, which now makes sense. I initially thought you were referring to bystander casualty of each incident, and was confused how you had any data on it.