• EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m wary af of this outlet, but kudos to them for flat out saying “falsely accuses” at least.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d say it’s more like he “baselessly accuses” them. Saying your source is social media is about as meaningful as saying your source is your gut.

      • mosiacmango
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        He said his source was “a man on TV.”

        Not even social media. He saw “a man” on the “tv” say it, so it must be true. Did he specify what man? No. What TV show? No.

        The moderators had comments from Springfield officials, and he had a nebulous TV man.

        That’s just false, not even baseless.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        The moderators had preemptively contacted the city manager of Springfield, Ohio. That person said it isn’t happening. Do you need more?

          • EvilBit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I mean to qualify as “falsely”, which is stronger than “baselessly”. I don’t doubt your position, I’m just appreciating that a media outlet is calling out falsehoods clearly without using softened terms.