• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem with this is that Republicans will just give the bill/law a different nickname to avoid using the one that makes them sound bad every time they oppose it: see Obamacare vs. Affordable Care Act.

    • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s really just about what markets well. Come up with a catchy name and that name will stick.

      The Democrats didn’t go far enough accepting the Obamacare name. Obama was all ‘sounds good to me, yes, I care’ or something along those lines when he was asked once, but the Democrats should have officially renamed the bill to Obamacare. Because there’s people who support the ACA but are against Obamacare and don’t realize they’re the same thing. If they’d changed the name there would only be Obamacare and a few of those people, a very slim amount, might realize that the bill thats helping them is Obamacare.

    • TachyonTele
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah that’s always gonna happen unfortunately. In a way I don’t even care about that, at least it got past. They can rable rable all they want as long as we’re all better off in the long run.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree, was just pointing out that the GOP love playing these branding games - so it’s hard to pin them down through weaponised legislation unfortunately… they lack the morals and scruples required for them to feel shame or embarrassment.

        Hell, one of their biggest talking points is to call it the Democrat Party (instead of the correct Democratic Party), and watch them put extra emphasis on the last 3 letters too.