• KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This is a weird patent; it seems to be describing something more akin to Pokemon Home than an actual in-game mechanic, but then the references talk about the pokemon storage system, so who knows?

      • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Their list of patents is enormous. They could throw darts drunk and in the dark, miss the board completely, and still likely land on something they could claim.

    • hOrni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Maybe not on that, but the creatures in Palworld are sometimes a direct ripoff of Pokémon. I’m with Nintendo on this one.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Oh no, both the wolves look like wolves. Never mind they have different color schemes and geometry; look, they’re both wolves!

        I approached the claims with an open mind, but when I read that the worst offender was the wolf I realized that none of the claims could possibly hold water.

      • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        That’s irrelevant. You can’t patent fantasy creatures. That’s a copyright issue. If they were suing for copyright infringement I might think they had a point, but they’re not.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I think the fact they’re going for a patent suit says they probably think they don’t have enough of an argument for a copyright suit which kind of makes sense. Just because the designs are similar doesn’t mean it’s copyright infringement.

  • Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Kind of surprised it took this long to be honest. Also a little surprised it’s a patent lawsuit, but then again it might be easier to prove infringement on a gameplay concept you have patented rather than copyright.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      This isn’t some guy who has loved their products for years and wanted to express how much joy he’s had from them by writing a comic about them - they can’t just go sue them immediately. This is a corporation, they have to make sure that it’s the right move. Come on, that’s Corpo 101