• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Explanation: One of the perks of being a soldier in service to Rome (or any ancient polity, for that matter) was that when a town refused to surrender, one’s commander would generally give permission for the troops to loot it thoroughly. The Romans did so in a pretty orderly fashion, splitting the looted proceeds by shares apportioned by rank (a centurion, for example, received 16 shares compared to a common legionary’s 1 share).

    This meant that when a wealthy town refused to surrender, its fall would laden down even ordinary soldiers with a considerable bonus! For obvious reasons, then, soldiers in antiquity were not always put out by a town’s refusal to surrender - and sometimes even openly called for a quick assault over a low-casualty siege!

  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thank you for your consistent Roman-posting, PugJesus. My “History of Rome by Mike Duncan” hyperfixation is really paying off right now.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m just a lowly legionary, doing my part to spread the good word of civilization! o7

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      A man is made to Romepost! Knowing at least a little bit of the content amuses or is appreciated is what keeps me posting! 🙏