Cripple. History Major. Irritable and in constant pain. Vaguely Left-Wing.

  • 4.39K Posts
  • 6.35K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 21st, 2023

help-circle




  • I mean, they’re right, industrial superiority just also requires the will to keep the war going for as long as necessary, and with whatever casualties necessary. For “Shitty war that violates another country for reasons we ourselves aren’t entirely clear on”, the will is generally lacking; for “A third of our country was just taken by traitors because they decided they only like democracy when they win”, there’s generally plenty of will.





  • But by making it into a guerilla war, all the military force the Union has can suddenly be concentrated even more disproportionately, as guerilla forces cannot concentrate in one area safely. All the ports of the South would be immediately lost, effectively, giving the Union a near-100% effective blockade. Appalachia, the best land for guerilla warfare in the Confederacy, was overwhelmingly pro-Union. Failing to defend their territory would mean the Union would have full access to all of the traitors’ slaves, which is the exact thing they were trying to avoid. And guerilla warfare is significantly more difficult without widespread fast-firing small arms.

    Even nomadic Native American nations of the period who were quite experienced in that form of warfare struggled to inflict serious casualties on even small punitive forces of the US Army, and against genocidal settler militias, because guerilla warfare is really a last-resort sort of thing for organized states. It isn’t a ‘best option’ in 99.99% of cases so much as a ‘Hail Mary’ when everything else has failed. Effectively surrendering the vast majority of your industrial, demographic, financial, and organizational strength to buy time is just not a good trade in most cases unless you think someone is coming to bail you out, WW2 style.









  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldMtoMeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksdOyOuWaNtTrUmPtOwIn???
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They believe if they don’t vote that the democrats will magically transform all of their policies to communist ideology to capture and extra 0.3% of voters at the expense of losing most of their voter base.

    It’s because it’s a deeply religious position for tankies. They aren’t interested in political strategy or, despite their claims, material conditions of society. They have utter disdain for ‘shitlibs’ like socdems and demsocs - the disdain they have for the vast majority of the population, who is even less on their side, is far greater. They have no desire to try and change opinions on the ground. Why would they want to stoop down to the level of sinners reactionaries? No, all they want is for the poors to suffer and the minorities to be exterminated in the hopes that their rapture sorry, proletarian revolution, will trigger because of the end days accelerationism.