Clinical information systems and healthcare patient portals are proving to be a significant waste of money. Millions of dollars are invested into developing and maintaining these platforms, often by third-party vendors, to provide patients with online access to their medical records. While the idea behind these portals is great in theory, the execution falls flat when healthcare providers continue to send massive amounts of paper copies through the mail, despite the digital system. This redundancy is both financially wasteful and environmentally harmful, especially when patients like me would prefer a paperless option.

Even more frustrating is that at my current health insurance company, I can’t even opt out of receiving paper copies. Despite several attempts to request this, I’m told there’s no way to stop the influx of mail. Now, I’m left with no choice but to purchase a $70 paper shredder just to deal with the overwhelming amount of unnecessary paperwork I receive. It feels like an outdated system where healthcare organizations are not fully committed to leveraging the digital tools they’ve invested in.

To make matters worse, the US Postal Service bears the burden of delivering all these unnecessary documents. This means taxpayers and other users of the postal system are indirectly subsidizing this inefficiency. It’s absurd that after all the time and money spent on developing patient portals, they’re not serving their purpose if the same information is just going to be mailed out anyway. It’s a huge missed opportunity for cost savings and sustainability.

For anyone curious about which platforms I’m talking about, my chart, Healow. These are the two that I have used. I’m sure there are many others, but Blue Cross is also part of the problem, they have their own custom proprietary software that you can log in and see your bill and all that stuff but they will still send you the crap in the mail. And cannot get them to stop

  • grudan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like to hope that my data won’t be released to companies like mychart without my consent.

    • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the doctor uses mychart, thats where they store the internal data whether you have an account or not. Its their entire computer system most of the time.

      • grudan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, a couple people are saying that, but I can’t find any information on how it’s implemented for providers. Regardless, not having an account is one less avenue for my information to be leaked. I do worry more about the doctor’s security practices (2FA, password complexity, password rotation, etc…) than my own.

        • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m sure some places use it to share info, but usually it basically becomes their entire software stack. Its like the salesforce of the health world. It does their billing, shift management, HR, CMS, everything.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You don’t have a clear picture.

      My Chart is just a module of Epic systems. If it’s accessible to you, it means your health care provider uses epic as EMR. You data is there, that’s how the hospital or health care provider office works

    • LilB0kChoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      released to companies like mychart

      What does this mean? MyChart is a software solution used by many medical providers. They don’t “release” medical information to them.

      This would be like thinking someone using Office on their computer is “releasing” documents they create to Microsoft.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, with o365, you technically do. Your example doesn’t work as well as you think it does.

        • LilB0kChoy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It does, your willful misinterpretation doesn’t change that.

          I looked through your post history, you seem to have at least enough technical aptitude to understand that.

          • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s a bit aggressive towards someone with whom you are having a civil, anecdotal discussion. You’re not trading in explosive pagers or nuclear materials. Could you dial it back a bit?

            • LilB0kChoy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I wasn’t having a discussion with them or you however when you present incorrect information or are intentionally obtuse I will call it out.

              If you want to engage me on the original topic I can happily explain both how the concept that a medical provider is “releasing” data to a software vendor is wrong and how equating O365 and Word is wrong.

              I imagine you’re too busy finding ways to be offended on someone else’s behalf and making light of recent terrorist acts though.

              • Semperverus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Excuse me but web office apps are 95% on par with their desktop counterparts now. There are still a few power features missing but that gap is slowly closing constantly.

                So I am not being willfully ignorant. I work with both daily.

                • LilB0kChoy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So I am not being willfully ignorant. I work with both daily.

                  Then you’re just being ignorant.

                  O365, which is actually Microsoft 365 now, is a suite of productivity software as well as collaboration and cloud-based services.

                  Word is a word processing program. They are not the same and use of Word does not equate to O365.

                  You should know this. Just like you should know that a business using a piece of software, such as a medical facility using Epic’s patient data management tools, does not equate to patient data being “released” to Epic.

                  Since you seem to be struggling with the concept perhaps a different example would be easier for you?

                  Just because you get an MRI doesn’t mean the data collected for the MRI is “released” to GE.

                  • Semperverus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Do you realize how much data is sent from Word to the O365/M365 service as you type if you have an internet connection? Even if you aren’t saving the document online, it sends a TON. Especially now with copilot.