• Delta_V@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Avoiding GM and using the most current tech are both bad ideas, for the same reason: Tesla is owned by a horrible person.

    After subtracting the expected quantity of deception in Chinese advertising, this new battery tech from China is still not as good as what Tesla has already been making for the last several years.

    • schizoidmanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You are comparing apples to oranges here since this is an LFP battery while the Tesla 4680 isn’t.

      • Delta_V@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The battery’s chemistry isn’t important to the end user. Price, capacity, longevity, and charge time is. If we assume CATL inflates their stats by the amount that’s standard for their market, we can infer their new battery is almost as good as Tesla’s old battery in terms of mechanical utility to the end user - their only hope of competing is to win big on price.

        I hope they can win that competition. I’d love to see GM produce an EV that’s almost as good as a Tesla and a lot cheaper.

    • MyOpinion
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Avoiding GM is always a good idea in my opinion. :)