Basically a repost pf things I said in the mega, but anecdotally I’m hearing that sales of fiction read by men are dropping precipitously, and English and literature classes in colleges are now dominated by women. It seems like young men are not being exposed to literature in the same way that they used to. Like, when I was in high school and college, you could be a “bro” kind of guy and read Chuck Palahniuk, or Hunter S. Thompson, or David Foster Wallace. For decades, authors like Hemmingway and Bukowski found receptive audiences in young men, not to mention all the crime fiction, horror, sci-fi, and fantasy that men have traditionally consumed. The “guy in your English class who loves David Foster Wallace” was a stereotype for a reason. I read in another thread that music is less culturally important to young men than it used to be. It seems like younger men just straight up see no value in reading literature or fiction, or exposing themselves or critically engaging with art and music, because the algorithms just railroad them into Alpha Gridset world.

Am I wrong about this? Am I being condescending and out of touch, or is this a real thing that’s happening, where the whole “male” culture is turning into grindset podcasts and streamers?

Edit: Okay, so the impression I’m getting is that everything is worse but also kind of the same as it ever was, which sounds right.

  • Andrzej3K [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t know if it’s attention spans or w/e but it does feel like fewer people of all generations are reading now, and when they do read, they just want slop. Anything that demands engagement or effort from the reader is denounced as ‘badly written’. It drives me a bit mad tbh, because at the same time that people smugly reject good literature, you can see that they’re unfulfilled reading the same old dreck for the millionth time.

    A common thing I used to see on Book Twitter was people complaining at the lack of beautifully written prose that focuses on the interior life and I just want to scream THAT’S MODERNISM YOU’RE DESCRIBING MODERNISM, READ THE WAVES, PLEASE READ THE WAVES, IT WILL MOVE YOU SO DEEPLY, but the thing is that while they want that, they also only read YA dystopian fiction written in the past simple as an iron rule.

    • GeorgeZBush [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most conversations I have with people my age start with “I saw this Tiktok…”. Very dire. Don’t care if I sound like a cranky boomer.

        • GeorgeZBush [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          Depends on the context really, but yeah, sometimes. I don’t mind any of it if other things get discussed, but it gets tiresome after a while.

        • AndJusticeForAll [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No one has ever been “i saw _____ on youtube” and it ever been anything morally good, very occasionally my IRL friend will reference a YT video essay or something, but otherwise it’s usually something frivolous (not necessarily bad) or some heinous culture war shit.

        • The_sleepy_woke_dialectic [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Aren’t tiktoks necessarily like <60 seconds? That’s intentionally engineered to be more mindless than a YouTube at least has the potential to be. On the other hand, I hear on the news that the tiktoks are radicalizing the youths so I gotta give critical support.

          On the OTHER other hand, it’s an APP owl-pissed

          I also appreciate that tiktok seems to intentionally lower the barrier to entry by (so I’ve heard) showing new accounts’ videos to people, where youtube would bury them

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I only started using TikTok cause a cool commie I follow on YouTube posts exclusive (long-form) content on TikTok 🤷‍♂️

                And tbh I found many other cool commies on my FYP. Like the algorithm is much better than YouTube. YouTube will still from time to time suggest sigma grindset videos to me, or straight up fascist shit even. That has never happened on TikTok.

    • The_sleepy_woke_dialectic [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      If something isn’t immediately understandable it’s “badly made”. This is true of software too. The term “user friendly” has come to mean “can a clueless new/prospective user pick this up and engage with it immediately?” less “Does this provide the experience existing users want to see?”

      • Andrzej3K [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh man don’t get me started. I’m so tired of Angry That The Terminal Even Exists Guy, and that’s before we even get to the co-optation of the concept of ‘accessibility’. NO, NOT BEING ARSED WITH LEARNING A DIFFERENT PARADIGM, WHILE UNDERSTANDABLE, IS NOT A DISABILITY

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      but the thing is that while they want that, they also only read YA dystopian fiction written in the past simple as an iron rule.

      I was watching a YouTube video yesterday tmaking fun of YA dystopian fiction and there were endless comments about how great the Hunger Games is. A lot of “Best book ever! Someday it will be seen as proper literature!” Granted, I haven’t read the book (only saw the movies), but it was Battle Royale in the future instead of the present day.

      I dunno. I want to let people enjoy things, but I also think a lot of this stuff is just shit. Battle Royale was already pulp, so Hunger Games being a copy is even more pulp. The same goes for 50 Shades of Gray being Twilight fan fiction turned into a whole series.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is it a bad thing that Pangloss was what made me seriously question my own apathy and conformism? I can see why Candide is kinda slop but I think if everyone read Candide we’d have a lot more people interested in actually changing the world, IDK.

        • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not at all it had (if im understanding correctly) the same on me when i first read it in my teens. I genuinely thought pangloss was the bees knees

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Right, and I think that this idea of “the world is exactly as it ought to be” is just such an important tenet of liberalism (ironic since Voltaire is one of the most important thinkers behind liberalism, someone more educated on philosophy can probably explain the contradiction there) and I think that breaking out of that bliss is so important for building a pro-social worldview. A better world is actually possible!

  • GeorgeZBush [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    IT SUCKS IT SUCKS IT SUCKS

    I’m begging anyone in my immediate circle to just read a book or think about what they watch just a little. You don’t have to be a scholar, God knows I’m not either, but it’s so BORING. I dunno, maybe it’s me, but I try to like, have a slightly in-depth conversation about any piece of media or art or whatever with someone and I just get nothing. We’re all hooked up to the slop spigot and can’t turn it off.

    Also GET OFF YOUR FUCKING PHONE WHEN WE’RE HANGING OUT.

    • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      I do not use any social media (except this site, I guess) and it is bizarre trying to connect with anyone else. When people ask for my insta or whatever, I just say I have a phone number and that’s it. If you want to get at me, text me or call me. I don’t look at my phone when I’m hanging out with people unless it’s to show them a picture or video that I took. People are always showing me tiktoks and I’m just like, “Oh, it’s youtube but worse.” Algorithmic content is poison. We’re approaching a point where people make zero choices about what goes into their brains and it’s terrifying and also the lamest fucking thing ever.

      • qocu [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Same here. I have a dummy cell phone that I use exclusively to receive calls or some text from my relatives (I prefer calls). It’s worrying how you can become a ghost if you’re not on any social network. People are usually like “give me your WhatsApp”, “tell me your Instagram user”, what? If you need me, here’s my number, that’s it, haha.

  • catonkatonk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not of that age, but imo it’s more a technological thing than a generational thing. People, of any age, cannot put their phones down. I personally have to make the conscious decision to disconnect if I’m going to read something or watch a movie or whatever. I imagine that for people who grew up with smartphones, that’s like cutting off a limb.

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    In that sense, yes absolutely. There’s a huge prevalent mindset of anti-intellectualism and hopelessness that leads to individualistic hustle culture with no appreciation for the arts. I think you’d see the same thing in any nascent fascist society in history, where any actual love for art is replaced by much shallower symbols in the service of reinforcing hegemonic masculinity. But even among my leftier friends, if I send them a message that’s longer than 2 sentences I’m very likely to receive an “I ain’t reading all that” (even a literal 3 sentence message).

    I think music has probably retained a similar relevance for my age group as previous ones, but the way that people engage with music is a lot more easy come easy go, which means that unless you have a specific kind of personality you’re unlikely to try to dig much meaning out of music, especially men with lower emotional intelligence. But there’s still the same drive to make music a part of your identity, just shallower.

    • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      But even among my leftier friends, if I send them a message that’s longer than 2 sentences I’m very likely to receive an “I ain’t reading all that” (even a literal 3 sentence message).

      This is wild, are all your conversations lacking any challenging thoughts?

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well I said “very likely,” the truth is probably closer to “I’m autistic and sometimes start a mini infodump on a friend who isn’t interested, but also sometimes I have a genuine thing to share that gets boy-who-cried-wolfed into being ignored.” If we’re already in conversation in person or over a call, we can usually talk about deeper subjects, although usually the men don’t participate as much in a deep convo. I don’t know how much of that is unique to my age group, but it lines up with OP’s observations.

        Funny enough one of my close friends, same age group, tells me he almost never talks about politics with another circle of friends of his, but one time got into a huge struggle session because one of them very dumbly kept defending the idea that it was cool and good that people could buy up and own lakes, while everyone else rejected the idea because it just seemed incongruent with their values, without much theoretical basis. And it makes sense that something like that happens, right? Private property is a downright intuitive ideological principle, but also has all sorts of points of contradiction with other values people have, even when people don’t go and read up on the enclosure of the commons, primitive accumulation, etc they understand that it’s not natural for a single person to be able to claim a whole lake. But because no one had the language or a system to talk about this problem, they just went in circles. Would this discussion have happened in a gen X group of dumb guys? I think it easily could have, but something about the fact that no one involved had a real dog in the race ideologically, they were just saying “no it doesn’t work that way” or “yeah but if you think about it should work that way,” is new.

        • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          the truth is probably closer to “I’m autistic and sometimes start a mini infodump on a friend who isn’t interested, but also sometimes I have a genuine thing to share that gets boy-who-cried-wolfed into being ignored.”

          Many such cases, down with neurotypicals.

          although usually the men don’t participate as much in a deep convo.

          I have interest in this, could you expand on it by chance?

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            I have interest in this, could you expand on it by chance?

            I don’t have a huge sample size, since I’m the only COVID conscious person I know and therefore haven’t been social IRL since 2020, but out of everyone I talk with the only one who bothers talking about the themes and framing of media in a deeper level is a femme NB friend. All the guys subscribe to the “it ain’t that deep” school of thought. That’s just my anecdotal experience though.

            • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              I have this anecdote more broadly, I can count on one hand the amount of deep, considered discussions I’ve had with men in my life, lol. Ty for sharing.

    • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      The way people engage with music these days seems to be whatever gets popular on tiktok and whatever hits the spotify algorithm jackpot. Outside of my friends who are musicians, I don’t think I’ve talked to single person under 40 that listens to albums.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s interesting, you don’t know many terminally online (online outside of tiktok) people? All the terminally online guys I know are at least kinda into some music subculture, usually some kind of indie rock or hip hop subgenre. The more normie types of guy aren’t listening to albums though.

    • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But even among my leftier friends, if I send them a message that’s longer than 2 sentences I’m very likely to receive an “I ain’t reading all that” (even a literal 3 sentence message).

      Keepin it a band I cut people off and out for this.

      If you can’t be fucked to read something longer than two sentences I don’t fuckin want you around me; and I don’t give a fuck how elitist that makes me come off. I don’t have time, energy, or patience for the willfully ignorant; and with my list of comorbidities, that kind of flippant comment is probably one of the quickest ways to tempt me into splitting on a motherfucker.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        rat-salute every now and then I ask my friends if they read the article I sent them, makes me feel bad because of the asymmetry since they haven’t sent me anything to read either so I can’t hold myself to the same standard. But we should all endeavor to surround ourselves with people that challenge us intellectually and hold ourselves to a higher standard along the way.

  • khizuo [ze/zir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not a man but I am in the age range. I mean it may be the case that more people are turning to parasocial relationships and falling into manosphere holes because of the internet. But also idk, maybe we’ve got to take stock of how misogyny plays a role into all this? Most men (and I truly mean, like 99% of them) don’t want to unpack the way they hold privilege and power over women. In decades past in which men were reading books more, they also had legal control over their wives? Women were gatekept out of academia for centuries. We live in a patriarchy and that needs to factor into any analysis of men as a social class that happens.

    • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there’s an internalized misogyny that’s getting worse at play as well, where it’s feminine (and therefore weak and shameful) to explore feelings or one’s inner life in a serious way. It seems like that kind of misogyny is increasing.

      • Sulvor [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think a good question to ask, is the misogyny increasing or are you just getting better at recognizing it and/or being exposed to more of it because of the internet?

        (the misogyny has always been there and is incredibly widespread)

        • HarryLime [any]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a good question. It’s generally my view that the past four years have been a massive setback for the left and the general sentiment has become much more reactionary, including an increase in overall misogyny. But I don’t know to what extent that’s reality or my own perception of things.

          • Sulvor [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think this ties back into my main comment.

            Nobody posts on their social media that they just enjoyed X, Y, or Z literature or art. I won’t say for sure that this is because the people who take the time to genuinely enjoy these things don’t really give a fuck to tell everybody else about it, but that’s what I think is happening.

            The internet has provided all sorts of assholes the ability to spread their message to millions of people. Unfortunately, you might be right that this is leading to an increase. Personally, I think these people were always around, and would’ve latched onto these type of ideas with or without the internet.

  • qocu [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    These are consequences of living in a system that rewards your individualism.

    I am in that age bracket, and when I was in college I found it quite difficult to get friends just because of that. Young men are easily influenced by capitalist propaganda, and not only are they manipulable, but they like to feel that way. So, most commonly, they feel like they’re in a competition all the time. If they read philosophy, they read about individualism and idealism (if they read philosophy at all). If they read fiction, they read only the misogynistic and crass author, and so on.

    Of course, today we live in the society of spectacle, so these people do not usually read, but are merely educated by images. This, coupled with zero critical thinking, simply generates a wave of stupid, misogynistic and individualistic people.

  • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Now that you mention it, yeah. Of my school cohort, me and my best friend at school are the only guys in the year who went into the arts. It’s actually kind of insane.

    At my uni, I was one of 2 guys in my class. In the whole year, it was me and maybe like 2 other guys who had any sort of traditional male hobbies/ways of presenting. Otherwise it was camp gay men, and a couple of straight guys who were just like, idk, theatre kids.

    I think it speaks to a socioeconomic thing too though. Most other guys I meet who are in the arts are living off daddy’s money.

    • iByteABit [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      It being a product of the generations simply being younger is made up, but the actual conditions that give rise to all these problems is objective. You can’t deny that younger generations are way more individualistic, cynical and even find it “cringe” when someone actually gives a shit about the world to sit down and learn about something that isn’t just an investement to their fucking career.

        • iByteABit [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe I have an overly negative opinion on the new generations, because being part of it, they are the ones that I hope will wake up and get organized the most, so when they act like wage zombies unable to think critically I get really disappointed in the world as a whole

      • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah; I’d say X’s take the cake for that bullshit. At least a good chunk of Z is interested in politics; either it be subtly or just general grassroots activism. X was a bunch of apathetic, depressive assholes who completely caved in the second they got any power or money. is this the case for all X? No. I don’t believe in clear generational differences.

        Millenials get a lot of shit; but in my opinion, they have gotten that power and money and there’s been a good few of them who maintain their humanity/morality in a fucked up system. X came after the boomers and wanted a piece no matter what they had to sacrifice to get it. I’m a Z.

        X literally grew up in one of the most hedonistic, individualistic eras of American history. Drugs, rock n roll and women were being commercialized and commodified in some excessive ways for the first time.

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      We are all basically boomers. Our lives are more or less the same as theirs, except for cellphones and blatantly obvious American decline.

      • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Except I couldn’t buy a house on my single income from the factory that gave me a job with full benefits and pension the moment I walked in the door.

  • SuperZutsuki [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anecdotal, but my friend is a high school math teacher and said most of the dudes want to be in real estate. So, at least in that particular high school the grindset pipeline seems to be in full effect.

      • Chronicon [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        anywhere that’s like upper 40 percentile could probably be like that now. There’s so much trash slop on youtube and tiktok about getting rich via various passive income techniques and varying levels of scam, and becoming a landlord+realtor seems to be a common one.

        • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          To be fair, being a landlord seems like one of the few viable avenues to material comfort and security. Getting a degree of working hard is certainly not enough anymore. The kids are reacting rationally to a sick economic system.

      • all roads now lead to the FIRE economy: Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. Real Estate is the one that requires the least credentialing to get into and promises the highest income for least effort if one hustlegrind the most shrewdly.

      • AndJusticeForAll [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s about a desire for wealth. They see where the money is and want in on it. Also it’s relatively low-skill and non-university than most professions. Bryan Quimby on Guys Podcast said like half the class his daughter just graduated in, the ones who weren’t going to university or weren’t planning to said they wanted to go into real estate. Which makes me think it’s not even like they crave it that badly, it’s just a backup plan they have because they gave up interest and hope in anything else.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah that’s definitely the case, it is about wealth, but the difference between going into medicine, engineering, or law and real estate is that you don’t need to start off wealthy to make the others work (assuming you can deal with student loans), but real estate takes wealth to break into. So what’s making so many working class men think they can become landlords or realtors without the connections and capital that are obviously prerequisites to attain that class position?

  • Sulvor [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t know if anyone has said this, cause there’s a lot to read here, but I think you’re just seeing all this online. Nobody posts on their social media that they just enjoyed X, Y, or Z literature or art. I won’t say for sure that this is because the people who take the time to genuinely enjoy these things don’t really give a fuck to tell everybody else about it, but that’s what I think is happening.

    I’m pretty sure there’s a term for this phenomenon that I can’t think of right now, but yeah you’re just getting exposed to drivel that is not representative of actual people.

    I’m older than this range, but still a “Zillenial” for context.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m in that age bracket and male and among the people I know reading literature is basically nonexistent. I constantly see people browse Instagram when randomly bored so a bunch of organizations use Instagram as their primary means of communication then I end up browsing Instagram to get updates from those organizations and get addicted to it like everyone else. Video games are social and also addicting so people prefer those over literature as well. Aside from that people have very limited time and want to spend the few moments of free time they have doing things that are more social, more engaging (which black marks on a white paper doesn’t do a great job at, I can barely pay attention to them for like 2 minutes), or more relevant to their hobbies or future. With music on the other hand I’ve seen differently, a lot of people use Spotify frequently and I’ve met quite a few people who have strong interests in certain bands or genres. Also while the internet has caused all sorts of problems regarding addiction and misinformation and people not being as social, I think it has also caused people to be more connected and empathetic on a large scale since they see the struggles of people outside of their physical social bubble.